<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Faculty Research Publications</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1957/29210</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:41:18 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2013-06-20T11:41:18Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Exotic annual grass invasion alters fuel amounts, continuity and moisture content</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1957/39418</link>
<description>Exotic annual grass invasion alters fuel amounts, continuity and moisture content
Davies, Kirk W.; Nafus, Aleta M.
Many exotic annual grasses are believed to increase wildfire frequency to the detriment of native vegetation&#13;
by increasing fine fuels and thus, creating a grass-fire cycle. However, information on differences in fuel characteristics&#13;
between invaded and non-invaded plant communities is lacking, or is based mainly on speculation and anecdotal evidence.&#13;
We compared fuel biomass, cover, continuity and moisture content in plant communities invaded and not invaded by&#13;
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.), an exotic annual grass, in 2010 and 2011 in south-eastern Oregon, USA. Annual grassinvaded&#13;
communities had higher fine fuel amounts, greater fuel continuity, smaller fuel gaps and lower fuel moisture&#13;
content than did non-invaded plant communities. These conditions would increase the probability that ignition sources&#13;
would contact combustible fuels and that fires would propagate. Fuel characteristics in the annual grass-invaded&#13;
communities in our study may also support faster spreading fires. Fuel moisture content was low enough to burn readily&#13;
more than a month earlier in annual grass-invaded communities than in non-invaded communities, thereby expanding the&#13;
wildfire season. The cumulative effect of these differences in fuel characteristics between exotic annual grass-invaded and&#13;
non-invaded plant communities is an increased potential for frequent, large-scale, fast-spreading wildfires. We suggest&#13;
that research is needed to develop methods to mediate and reverse these changes in fuel characteristics associated with&#13;
B. tectorum invasion.
To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work.&#13;
This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by CSIRO Publishing and can be found at:http://www.publish.csiro.au/.
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1957/39418</guid>
<dc:date>2012-10-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Are Early Summer Wildfires an Opportunity to Revegetate Exotic Annual Grass–Invaded Plant Communities?</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1957/38560</link>
<description>Are Early Summer Wildfires an Opportunity to Revegetate Exotic Annual Grass–Invaded Plant Communities?
Davies, Kirk W.; Nafus, Aleta M.; Johnson, Dustin D.
Medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae [L.] Nevski) is an exotic annual grass invading western rangelands. Successful&#13;
revegetation of invaded-plant communities can be prohibitively expensive because it often requires iterative applications of&#13;
integrated control and revegetation treatments. Prescribed burning has been used to control medusahead and prepare seedbeds&#13;
for revegetation, but burning has been constrained by liability concerns and has produced widely varying results. Capitalizing&#13;
on naturally occurring wildfires could reduce revegetation costs and alleviate liability concerns. Thus, our objective was to&#13;
determine if early summer wildfires and fall drill seeding could be used as a treatment combination to decrease medusahead and&#13;
increase perennial and native vegetation. Treatments were evaluated pretreatment and for 3 yr postfire at six sites and included&#13;
1) an early summer wildfire combined with a seeding treatment (burn and seed) and 2) a nontreated (no burn, no seed) control.&#13;
Perennial grass density was 4.6- to 10.0-fold greater in the burn-and-seed treatment compared to the control in the first 3 yr&#13;
posttreatment (P&lt;0.05). Exotic annual grass density and cover in the third year posttreatment were lower in the burn-and-seed&#13;
treatment than in the control (P&lt;0.05). However, exotic annual grass density was still &gt;130 individuals •  m ⁻² in the burn-andseed&#13;
treatment. The density of exotic annual grass is of concern because over time medusahead may displace perennial grasses&#13;
and annual forbs that increased with the burn-and-seed treatment. Though not directly tested in this study, we suggest that,&#13;
based on other research, the burn-and-seed treatment may need to incorporate a preemergent herbicide application to further&#13;
suppress medusahead and increase the establishment of seeded vegetation. However, it appears that early summer wildfires may&#13;
provide an opportunity to reduce the cost of integrated programs to revegetate medusahead-invaded plant communities.
To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work.&#13;
This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by Society for Range Management and can be found at: http://www.rangelands.org/.
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1957/38560</guid>
<dc:date>2013-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mowing Wyoming Big Sagebrush Communities With Degraded Herbaceous Understories: Has a Threshold Been Crossed?</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1957/35050</link>
<description>Mowing Wyoming Big Sagebrush Communities With Degraded Herbaceous Understories: Has a Threshold Been Crossed?
Davies, Kirk W.; Bates, Jonathan D.; Nafus, Aleta M.
Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis [Beetle &amp; A. Young] S.L. Welsh) plant communities with degraded native herbaceous understories occupy vast expanses of the western United States. Restoring the native herbaceous understory in these communities is needed to provide higher-quality wildlife habitat, decrease the risk of exotic plant invasion, and increase forage for livestock. Though mowing is commonly applied in sagebrush communities with the objective of increasing native herbaceous vegetation, vegetation response to this treatment in degraded Wyoming big sagebrush communities is largely unknown. We compared mowed and untreated control plots in five Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities with degraded herbaceous understories in eastern Oregon for 3 yr posttreatment. Native perennial herbaceous vegetation did not respond to mowing, but exotic annuals increased with mowing. Density of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.), a problematic exotic annual grass, was 3.3-fold greater in the mowed than untreated control treatment in the third year posttreatment. Annual forb cover, largely consisting of exotic species, was 1.8-fold greater in the mowed treatment compared to the untreated control in the third year posttreatment. Large perennial grass cover was not influenced by mowing and remained below 2%. Mowing does not appear to promote native herbaceous vegetation in degraded Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities and may facilitate the conversion of shrublands to exotic annual grasslands. The results of this study suggest that mowing, as a stand-alone treatment, does not restore the herbaceous understory in degraded Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities. We recommend that mowing not be applied in Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities with degraded understories without additional treatments to limit exotic annuals and promote perennial herbaceous vegetation.
This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the Society for Range Management and can be found at: http://www.srmjournals.org/loi/rama. To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1957/35050</guid>
<dc:date>2012-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agave salmiana Plant Communities in Central Mexico as Affected by Commercial Use</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/1957/35049</link>
<description>Agave salmiana Plant Communities in Central Mexico as Affected by Commercial Use
Martinez Salvador, Martin; Mata-Gonzalez, Ricardo; Morales Nieto, Carlos; Valdez-Cepeda, Ricardo
Agave salmiana is a native plant species harvested for the commercial production of mezcal (Agave spirits) in the highlands of central Mexico. The objective of this study was to identify vegetation changes in natural communities where A. salmiana has been differentially harvested for commercial purposes. Three plant community categories were identified in the state of Zacatecas based on their history of A. salmiana utilization: short (less than 10 years of use), moderate (about 25 years), and long (60 or more years). Species cover, composition, and density were evaluated in field surveys by use category. A gradient of vegetation structure of the communities parallels the duration of A. salmiana use. A. salmiana density was greatest (3,125 plants ha⁻¹) in the short-use areas and less (892 plants ha⁻¹) in the moderate-use areas, associated with markedly greater density of shrubs (200%) and Opuntia spp. (50%) in moderate-use areas. The main shrubs were Larrea tridentata, Mimosa biuncifera, Jatropha dioica and Buddleia scordioides while the main Opuntia species were Opuntia leucotricha and Opuntia robusta. A. salmiana density was least (652 plants ha⁻¹) in the long-use areas where shrubs were less abundant but Opuntia spp. density was 25% higher than in moderate-use areas. We suggest that shrubs may increase with moderate use creating an intermediate successional stage that facilitates the establishment of Opuntia spp. Long-term Agave use is generating new plant communities dominated by Opuntia spp. (nopaleras) as a replacement of the original communities dominated by A. salmiana (magueyeras).
This is the author's peer-reviewed final manuscript, as accepted by the publisher. The published article is copyrighted by Springer and can be found at: http://www.springer.com/environment/environmental+management/journal/267.
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1957/35049</guid>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
