mirage   mirage   mirage

Keeping state policy public : meeting accountability in commission governance

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Achterman, Gail
dc.creator Stauffer, Scott
dc.date.accessioned 2009-05-05T20:11:18Z
dc.date.available 2009-05-05T20:11:18Z
dc.date.copyright 2009-05-05
dc.date.issued 2009-04-29
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1957/11466
dc.description Graduation date: 2009 en
dc.description.abstract Despite their widespread use and presence at all levels of government, public commissions and boards are rarely given much attention, by the general public, academia, or surprisingly by public policy and agency experts. As a state infrastructure governing entity transportation commissions often deal with controversy, but do we really understand the roles and responsibilities of these important oversight mechanisms of typically massive state transportation agencies? And more importantly, do the usually volunteer members of these important policymaking and activity monitoring boards know what they are supposed to be doing? How would a transportation commission chair know her commission is carrying out their statutorily mandated duties in an efficient and effective way? To answer these questions, and to collect basic data about the current state of our transportation commissions nationally, this essay analyzes the time management practices of one state transportation commission, reviews existing literature on public and corporate governance, and considers the results of a nation-wide survey of state transportation commission administrative assistants. The results support the prevailing conclusion that there is a lack of literature on public commission government and that because of their often un-distinguished role in relation to the agency, a profound lack of independence and identity exists which ought to be corrected if the intent of these boards is to provide policy leadership and accountability to the citizens they represent and serve. By reconsidering how they run their regular meetings, focusing on the key agency-commission relationships, and devoting time to consider their own performance and expectations, transportation commissions can better assert themselves in their necessary public duty of ensuring efficient and effective government. This essay sheds light on the present condition of our transportation commissions and considers how transportation commissions ought to manage their time for effective public policy creation and oversight. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.subject Public Commissions en
dc.subject Transportation Commission en
dc.subject Oregon Transportation en
dc.subject Public Administration en
dc.subject.lcsh Oregon Transportation Commission -- Rules and practice en
dc.title Keeping state policy public : meeting accountability in commission governance en
dc.type Research Paper en
dc.degree.name Master of Public Policy (M.P.P.) en
dc.degree.level Master's en
dc.degree.discipline Liberal Arts en
dc.degree.grantor Oregon State University en
dc.contributor.committeemember Steel, Brent S.
dc.contributor.committeemember Lunch, William


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScholarsArchive@OSU


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics