Technical Report
 

Applying systematic evidence reviews in Oregon forest policy: opportunities and challenges

Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/technical_reports/1831cq58p

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • Section I contains an introduction to the subject of Scientific Evidence Review. Section II reviews Oregon state mandates to use “best available science” in policymaking and summarizes ODF efforts to address these mandates. Section III provides an overview of Systematic Evidence Reviews and how they are conducted in the fields of clinical medicine and public health. Section IV summarizes some relevant critiques of SER methods and cautions concerning their use. Section V addresses differences and commonalities between clinical medicine and ecosystem science, and the potential for applying SERs to conservation and natural resource policy questions. Section VI offers some principles and guidelines about how ODF could apply components of SERs to their science assessments. Section VII reflects on where efforts to conduct and utilize SERs are likely to go in the future.
  • Keywords: forestry forest policy "dueling science" systematic evidence based review Oregon Board of Forestry (BOF) natural resources Systematic Evidence Review (SER) Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) "best available science"
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
Non-Academic Affiliation
Rights Statement
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
File Format
File Extent
  • 566667 bytes
Replaces

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

In Collection:

Items