mirage   mirage   mirage

Three methods for evaluating Measure 37 claims

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.creator Oregon State University. Extension Service
dc.creator Jaeger, William K. (William Kenneth)
dc.date.accessioned 2011-03-11T20:16:12Z
dc.date.available 2011-03-11T20:16:12Z
dc.date.issued 2007-03
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1957/20484
dc.description Published March 2007. Reviewed July 2013. Please look for up-to-date information in the OSU Extension Catalog: http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog en
dc.description.abstract Measure 37 imposes an enormous burden on government. It asks government to know the unknowable: what would the world look like if a particular land use regulation had not been enacted or enforced? And, how would land prices in that alternative world compare to land prices in the real world? In this publication, we examine three methods for evaluating Measure 37 claims based on three criteria: (1) practicality or cost, (2) logic or reasonableness, and (3) the rate of correct answers for a variety of scenarios. We evaluate the following methods. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Corvallis, Or. : Extension Service, Oregon State University en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries EM (Oregon State University. Extension Service) en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries 8933 en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries EM en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries 8933 en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Land use -- Law and legislation -- Oregon -- Evaluation en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Real property -- Valuation -- Oregon en_US
dc.title Three methods for evaluating Measure 37 claims en_US
dc.type Technical Report en_US
dc.description.peerreview yes en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScholarsArchive@OSU


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics