mirage   mirage   mirage

Impacts of Aquaculture Extension on Pond Operators and the Rural Community

DSpace/Manakin Repository

ScholarsArchive@OSU will be migrating to a new platform in the coming weeks - likely by November 1, 2017. We do not expect major service disruptions during this process, but if you encounter problems or have questions, please contact us at scholarsarchive@oregonstate.edu. Thank you for your patience.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editor Johnston, Richard S.
dc.contributor.editor Shriver, Ann L.
dc.creator Thompson, Paul M.
dc.creator Sultana, Parvin
dc.creator Nuruzzaman, Md.
dc.creator Khan, Akm Firoz
dc.date 2001
dc.date.accessioned 2012-07-02T21:19:12Z
dc.date.available 2012-07-02T21:19:12Z
dc.date.copyright 2001
dc.date.issued 2001
dc.identifier.citation Thompson, Paul M., Sultana, Parvin, Nuruzzaman, Md. and Khan, Akm Firoz. Impacts of Aquaculture Extension on Pond Operators and the Rural Community. In: Microbehavior and Macroresults:Proceedings of the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute ofFisheries Economics and Trade, July 10-14, 2000, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.Compiled by Richard S. Johnston and Ann L. Shriver. InternationalInstitute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET), Corvallis, 2001. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1957/30440
dc.description.abstract In 1990-1993 in Kapasia sub-district in central Bangladesh ICLARM introduced low-input aquaculture for pond owners to adapt into their farming systems. Impacts on production, fish consumption and markets were assessed in 1998-1999. The percentage of ponds stocked increased from 1990 to 1998, but did not differ significantly between past participants (increased from 61% to 90%), neighboring pond operators or a control area. In 1992 participants produced 2 t/ha compared with 0.5 t/ha in 1990. In 1997-1998 the previous participants produced significantly more 2.2 t/ha, compared with 1.6 t/ha for other pond operators in Kapasia and 1.3 t/ha in the control area (p<0.001, t-test). Non-participants learnt of aquaculture from neighbors or mass media. Total production from ponds in the project area in 1998 was 4.2 times greater than in 1990. Without that project, production would probably have gradually increased 2.8 times. Local fish markets were surveyed in 1991 and 1999. The volume of fish traded increased 8 times. Carp from local ponds now dominate trade. Consequently the real price of carp has fallen, while that of indigenous fish has increased. Detailed participatory monitoring revealed much higher fish consumption than recall data. Pond owning households consumed 211 kg per household in 1998-1999 (just under 90 g/person/day), about 25% came from their own ponds. Small fish purchased or caught in flooded fields were mainly consumed, pond fish were sold for income. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service MG Kailis Group en_US
dc.publisher International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade en_US
dc.subject Fisheries Economics en_US
dc.subject Aquaculture en_US
dc.subject Aquaculture: Incentives to Adopt and Impacts on Communities en_US
dc.title Impacts of Aquaculture Extension on Pond Operators and the Rural Community en_US
dc.type Research Paper en_US

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScholarsArchive@OSU

Advanced Search


My Account