Article
 

Density Can Be Misleading for Low-Density Species: Benefits of Passive Acoustic Monitoring

Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/kw52j8644

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • Climate-induced changes may be more substantial within the marine environment, where following ecological change is logistically difficult, and typically expensive. As marine animals tend to produce stereotyped, long-range signals, they are ideal for repeatable surveying. In this study we illustrate the potential for calling rates to be used as a tool for determining habitat quality by using an Antarctic pack-ice seal, the leopard seal, as a model. With an understanding of the vocal behavior of a species, their seasonal and diurnal patterns, sex and age-related differences, an underwater passive-acoustic survey conducted alongside a visual survey in an arc of 4,225 km across the Davis Sea, Eastern Antarctica, showed that while acoustic and visual surveys identified similar regions as having high densities, the acoustic surveys surprisingly identified the opposite regions as being 'critical' habitats. Density surveys of species that cannot be differentiated into population classes may be misleading because overall density can be a negative indicator of habitat quality. Under special circumstances acoustics can offer enormous advantage over traditional techniques and open up monitoring to regions that are remote, difficult and expensive to work within, no longer restricting long-term community assessment to resource-wealthy communities. As climatic change affects a broad range of organisms across geographic boundaries we propose that capitalizing on the significant advances in passive acoustic technology, alongside physical acoustics and population modeling, can help in addressing ecological questions more broadly.
License
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
Journal Title
Journal Volume
  • 8
Journal Issue/Number
  • 1
Non-Academic Affiliation
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • This study was supported financially by the Antarctic Scientific Advisory Committee (ASAC 552 and 1140), the Sea World Research and RescueFoundation Inc., the Scott Foundation and the U.S. Office of Naval Research grant # N00014-11-1-0606 this is NOAA PMEL contribution # 3836. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

In Collection:

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details KlinckHolgerHMSCDensityCanBe.pdf 2017-07-08 Public Download