Article
 

Comparison of Bite-Count and Rumen Evacuation Techniques to Estimate Cattle Diet Quality

Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/9p290b359

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • We conducted a study to compare the bite-count technique (BC) of estimating forage intake and synthesized diet quality to direct estimates of diet quantity and quality with the use of the rumen evacuation technique (RE). We used four rumen-fistulated steers to evaluate both techniques. Four enclosures in a mixed-conifer rangeland were used. Each enclosure contained two 0.25-ha paddocks that were either nonstocked or stocked by cattle to remove 32 ± 4% of standing crop. We recorded bite-count data during foraging bouts for each steer in each paddock, and then evacuated each rumen following each foraging bout during summer (August). Paddocks stocked prior to each 20-min trial had a reduced (P < 0.05) quantity of forage consumed regardless of technique. BC and RE gave similar (P > 0.10) results on diet quantity and digestibility. However, BC-derived estimates were lower (P < 0.05) for crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), ash, and neutral detergent fiber (NDF). In summary, although BC has the advantage of not requiring rumen-fistulated animals, it did not yield comparable results to RE under range conditions with dense and diverse vegetation. Therefore, investigators should calibrate bite-count technique against fistula technique to solve any accuracy problem in their specific experimental conditions whenever possible.
  • Keywords: Diet sampling, Diet Selection, Mixed conifer rangeland, Free ranging animals, Foraging trials
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Damiran, D., DelCurto, T., Findholt, S. L., Johnson, B. K., & Vavra, M. (2013). Comparison of bite-count and rumen evacuation techniques to estimate cattle diet quality. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 66(1), 106-109. doi: 10.2111/REM-D-12-00046.1
Journal Title
Journal Volume
  • 66
Journal Issue/Number
  • 1
Rights Statement
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details DelCurtoTimothyAnimalScienceComparisonBiteCount.pdf 2017-07-13 Public Download