Purpose: We reviewed large-budget, National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with behavioral interventions to assess (1) publication rates, (2) trial registration, (3) use of objective measures, (4) significant behavior and physiological change, and (5) effect sizes.
Methods: We identified large-budget grants (>$500,000/year) funded by NIH (National Heart...
Full Text:
Table 5. Means, standard deviations or errors, or proportions used to calculate effect sizes of the
Purpose: We reviewed large-budget, National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with behavioral interventions to assess (1) publication rates, (2) trial registration, (3) use of objective measures, (4) significant behavior and physiological change, and (5) effect sizes.
Methods: We identified large-budget grants (>$500,000/year) funded by NIH (National Heart...
Full Text:
Appendix Table 4. Means, standard deviations or errors, or proportions used to calculate effect sizes of
Purpose: We reviewed large-budget, National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with behavioral interventions to assess (1) publication rates, (2) trial registration, (3) use of objective measures, (4) significant behavior and physiological change, and (5) effect sizes.
Methods: We identified large-budget grants (>$500,000/year) funded by NIH (National Heart...
Full Text:
Outcome
Effectsize Group difference
in original units
Primary
Physiological
Outcome
EffectSize
Purpose: We reviewed large-budget, National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with behavioral interventions to assess (1) publication rates, (2) trial registration, (3) use of objective measures, (4) significant behavior and physiological change, and (5) effect sizes.
Methods: We identified large-budget grants (>$500,000/year) funded by NIH (National Heart...
Full Text:
Participant
Description
N size
Interv
ention
N Size
Comparator
ACT22 1994 2001 NCT00000551 1999
Purpose: We reviewed large-budget, National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with behavioral interventions to assess (1) publication rates, (2) trial registration, (3) use of objective measures, (4) significant behavior and physiological change, and (5) effect sizes.
Methods: We identified large-budget grants (>$500,000/year) funded by NIH (National Heart...
Purpose: We reviewed large-budget, National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with behavioral interventions to assess (1) publication rates, (2) trial registration, (3) use of objective measures, (4) significant behavior and physiological change, and (5) effect sizes.
Methods: We identified large-budget grants (>$500,000/year) funded by NIH (National Heart...
Full Text:
size calculator developed by
the Campbell Collaboration [16].
Effect sizes were derived from the mean
The distribution and range of lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) has been reduced by >90% since European settlement of the Great Plains of North America. Currently, lesser prairie-chickens occupy 3 general vegetation communities: sand sagebrush (Artemisia filifolia), sand shinnery oak (Quercus havardii), and mixed-grass prairies juxtaposed with Conservation Reserve Program grasslands....
Habitat loss and fragmentation are the greatest threats to biodiversity worldwide. Fragmentation impacts landscape configuration, resulting in a larger number of patches that are smaller in size and further apart from one another. Island biogeography and metapopulation theory predict populations in these remnant patches should be smaller, have higher extinction...