Article

 

Understory Cover Responses to Piñon-Juniper Treatments Across Tree Dominance Gradients in the Great Basin Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/6h440v371

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the Society for Range Management and can be found at:  http://www.bioone.org/loi/rama.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Alternative Title
  • Understory Cover Responses to Pinon-Juniper Treatments Across Tree Dominance Gradients in the Great Basin
Creator
Abstract
  • Piñon (Pinus spp.) and juniper (Juniperus spp.) trees are reduced to restore native vegetation and avoid severe fires where they have expanded into sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.) communities. However, what phase of tree infilling should treatments target to retain desirable understory cover and avoid weed dominance? Prescribed fire and tree felling were applied to 8–20-ha treatment plots at 11 sites across the Great Basin with a tree-shredding treatment also applied to four Utah sites. Treatments were applied across a tree infilling gradient as quantified by a covariate tree dominance index (TDI=tree cover/[tree+shrub+tall perennial grass cover]). Mixed model analysis of covariance indicated that treatment x covariate interactions were significant (P < 0.05) for most vegetation functional groups 3 yr after treatment. Shrub cover was most reduced with fire at any TDI or by mechanical treatment after infilling resulted in over 50% shrub cover loss (TDI > 0.4). Fire increased cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) cover by an average of 4.2% for all values of TDI. Cutting or shredding trees generally produced similar responses and increased total perennial herbaceous and cheatgrass cover by an average of 10.2% and 3.8%, at TDIs ≥ 0.35 and ≥ 0.45. Cheatgrass cover estimated across the region was < 6% after treatment, but two warmer sites had high cheatgrass cover before (19.2% and 27.2%) and after tree reduction (26.6% and 50.4%). Fuel control treatments are viable management options for increasing understory cover across a range of sites and tree cover gradients, but should be accompanied by revegetation on warmer sites with depleted understories where cheatgrass is highly adapted. Shrub and perennial herbaceous cover can be maintained by mechanically treating at lower TDI. Perennial herbaceous cover is key for avoiding biotic and abiotic thresholds in this system through resisting weed dominance and erosion.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Roundy, B. A., Miller, R. F., Tausch, R. J., Young, K., Hulet, A., Rau, B., ... & Egget, D. (2014). Understory Cover Responses to Piñon-Juniper Treatments Across Tree Dominance Gradients in the Great Basin. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 67(5), 482-494. doi:10.2111/REM-D-13-00018.1
Journal Title
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • This is Contribution Number 78 of the Sagebrush Steppe Treatment Evaluation Project (SageSTEP), funded by the US Joint Fire Science Program, the Bureau of Land Management, the National Interagency Fire Center, and the Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative.
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Erin Clark(erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2014-11-21T19:05:00Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MillerRichardAnimalRangelandSciencesUnderstoryCoverResponses.pdf: 750051 bytes, checksum: 788edbf4abab338637612b8c70006d5d (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2014-11-21T19:05:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MillerRichardAnimalRangelandSciencesUnderstoryCoverResponses.pdf: 750051 bytes, checksum: 788edbf4abab338637612b8c70006d5d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-09
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Erin Clark (erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2014-11-21T19:04:44Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MillerRichardAnimalRangelandSciencesUnderstoryCoverResponses.pdf: 750051 bytes, checksum: 788edbf4abab338637612b8c70006d5d (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items