Article

 

Comparing Ecoregional Classifications for Natural Areas Management in the Klamath Region, USA Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/79407z920

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • We compared three existing ecoregional classification schemes (Bailey, Omernik, and World Wildlife Fund) with two derived schemes (Omernik Revised and Climate Zones) to explore their effectiveness in explaining species distributions and to better understand natural resource geography in the Klamath Region, USA. We analyzed presence/absence data derived from digital distribution maps for trees, amphibians, large mammals, small mammals, migrant birds, and resident birds using three statistical analyses of classification accuracy (Analysis of Similarity, Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates, and Classification Strength). The classifications were roughly comparable in classification accuracy, with Omernik Revised showing the best overall performance. Trees showed the strongest fidelity to the classifications, and large mammals showed the weakest fidelity. We discuss the implications for regional biogeography and describe how intermediate resolution ecoregional classifications may be appropriate for use as natural areas management domains.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Sarr, D. A., Duff, A., Dinger, E. C., Shafer, S. L., Wing, M., Seavy, N. E., & Alexander, J. D. (2015). Comparing Ecoregional Classifications for Natural Areas Management in the Klamath Region, USA. Natural Areas Journal, 35(3), 360-377. doi:10.3375/043.035.0301
Journal Title
Journal Volume
  • 35
Journal Issue/Number
  • 3
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • S. Shafer was supported by the US Geological Survey Climate and Land Use Change Research and Development Program.
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Patricia Black(patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-08-18T21:07:50Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 WingMichaelEnginResorcesMgmtComparingEcoregionalClassifications .pdf: 14030756 bytes, checksum: 915df3b7be22e0bdbd5aaf8c030d8ab1 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2015-08-18T21:07:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 WingMichaelEnginResorcesMgmtComparingEcoregionalClassifications .pdf: 14030756 bytes, checksum: 915df3b7be22e0bdbd5aaf8c030d8ab1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-07
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Patricia Black (patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-08-18T21:07:29Z No. of bitstreams: 1 WingMichaelEnginResorcesMgmtComparingEcoregionalClassifications .pdf: 14030756 bytes, checksum: 915df3b7be22e0bdbd5aaf8c030d8ab1 (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items