Simulating extreme total water levels using a time-dependent, extreme value approach Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF


Attribute NameValues
  • Coastal flood hazard zones and the design of coastal defenses are often devised using the maximum recorded water level or a ‘‘design’’ event such as the 100 year return level, usually projected from observed extremes. Despite technological advances driving more consistent instrumental records of waves and water levels, the observational record may be short, punctuated with intermittent gaps, and vary in quality. These issues in the record often preclude accurate and robust estimates of extreme return level events. Here we present a total water level full simulation model (TWL-FSM) that simulates the various components of TWLs (waves, tides, and nontidal residuals) in a Monte Carlo sense, taking into account conditional dependencies that exist between the various components. Extreme events are modeled using nonstationary extreme value distributions that include seasonality and climate variability. The resulting synthetic TWLs allow for empirical extraction of return level events and the ability to more robustly estimate and assess present-day flood and erosion hazards. The approach is demonstrated along a northern Oregon, USA littoral cell but is applicable to beaches anywhere wave and water level records or hindcasts are available. Simulations result in extreme 100 year TWL return levels as much as 90 cm higher than those extrapolated from the ‘‘observational’’ record. At the Oregon site, this would result in 30% more coastal flooding than the ‘‘observational’’ 100 year TWL return level projections. More robust estimates of extreme TWLs and tighter confidence bounds on return level events can aid coastal engineers, managers, and emergency planners in evaluating exposure to hazards.
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
  • Serafin, K. A., & Ruggiero, P. (2014). Simulating extreme total water levels using a time-dependent, extreme value approach, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119(9), 6305-6329. doi:10.1002/2014JC010093
Journal Title
Journal Volume
  • 119
Journal Issue/Number
  • 9
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • This work would not have been possible without the support of NOAA’s Coastal and Ocean Climate Applications (COCA) program under NOAA grant NA12OAR4310109, the Climate Impacts Research Consortium (CIRC), under NOAA grant NA10OAR4310218, and the PRBO Conservation Science.
Peer Reviewed



This work has no parents.