Article

 

Geographic Variability in Elevation and Topographic Constraints on the Distribution of Native and Nonnative Trout in the Great Basin Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/9w0324893

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The article is copyrighted by the American Fisheries Society and published by Taylor & Francis. It can be found at:  http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/utaf20/current#.UyiHN_Pn-Hs.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • Understanding local and geographic factors influencing species distributions is a prerequisite for conservation planning. Our objective in this study was to model local and geographic variability in elevations occupied by native and nonnative trout in the northwestern Great Basin, USA. To this end, we analyzed a large existing data set of trout presence (5,156 observations) to evaluate two fundamental factors influencing occupied elevations: climate-related gradients in geography and local constraints imposed by topography. We applied quantile regression to model upstream and downstream distribution elevation limits for each trout species commonly found in the region (two native and two nonnative species). With these models in hand, we simulated an upstream shift in elevation limits of trout distributions to evaluate potential consequences of habitat loss. Downstream elevation limits were inversely associated with latitude, reflecting regional gradients in temperature. Upstream limits were positively related to maximum stream elevation as expected. Downstream elevation limits were constrained topographically by valley bottom elevations in northern streams but not in southern streams, where limits began well above valley bottoms. Elevation limits were similar among species. Upstream shifts in elevation limits for trout would lead to more habitat loss in the north than in the south, a result attributable to differences in topography. Because downstream distributions of trout in the north extend into valley bottoms with reduced topographic relief, trout in more northerly latitudes are more likely to experience habitat loss associated with an upstream shift in lower elevation limits. By applying quantile regression to relatively simple information (species presence, elevation, geography, topography), we were able to identify elevation limits for trout in the Great Basin and explore the effects of potential shifts in these limits that could occur in response to changing climate conditions that alter streams directly (e.g., through changes in temperature and precipitation) or indirectly (e.g., through changing water use).
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Warren, D. R., Dunham, J. B., & Hockman-Wert, D. (2014). Geographic Variability in Elevation and Topographic Constraints on the Distribution of Native and Nonnative Trout in the Great Basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 143(1), 205-218. doi:10.1080/00028487.2013.833551
Series
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • Funding was provided by the Great Basin Landscape Conservation Cooperative and U.S. Geological Survey grant G10AC00551.
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Erin Clark (erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2014-03-18T17:51:35Z No. of bitstreams: 1 WarrenDanaFisheriesWildlifeGeographicVariabilityElevation.pdf: 911918 bytes, checksum: b6fd239bacc0437be87c8a11e05640b3 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Erin Clark(erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2014-03-18T17:53:14Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 WarrenDanaFisheriesWildlifeGeographicVariabilityElevation.pdf: 911918 bytes, checksum: b6fd239bacc0437be87c8a11e05640b3 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2014-03-18T17:53:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 WarrenDanaFisheriesWildlifeGeographicVariabilityElevation.pdf: 911918 bytes, checksum: b6fd239bacc0437be87c8a11e05640b3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-01-01

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items