Quantifying Avian Predation on Fish Populations: Integrating Predator-Specific Deposition Probabilities in Tag Recovery Studies Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/gt54kp785

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by Taylor & Francis and can be found at:  http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/utaf20#.VVYI7UZSVAM.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Accurate assessment of specific mortality factors is vital to prioritize recovery actions for threatened and endangered species. For decades, tag recovery methods have been used to estimate fish mortality due to avian predation. Predation probabilities derived from fish tag recoveries on piscivorous waterbird colonies typically reflect minimum estimates of predation due to an unknown and unaccounted-for fraction of tags that are consumed but not deposited on-colony (i.e., deposition probability). We applied an integrated tag recovery modeling approach in a Bayesian context to estimate predation probabilities that accounted for predator-specific tag detection and deposition probabilities in a multiple-predator system. Studies of PIT tag deposition were conducted across three bird species nesting at seven different colonies in the Columbia River basin, USA. Tag deposition probabilities differed significantly among predator species (Caspian terns Hydroprogne caspia: deposition probability = 0.71, 95% credible interval [CRI] = 0.51–0.89; double-crested cormorants Phalacrocorax auritus: 0.51, 95% CRI = 0.34–0.70; California gulls Larus californicus: 0.15, 95% CRI = 0.11–0.21) but showed little variation across trials within a species or across years. Data from a 6-year study (2008–2013) of PIT-tagged juvenile Snake River steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss (listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act) indicated that colony-specific predation probabilities ranged from less than 0.01 to 0.17 and varied by predator species, colony location, and year. Integrating the predator-specific deposition probabilities increased the predation probabilities by a factor of approximately 1.4 for Caspian terns, 2.0 for double-crested cormorants, and 6.7 for California gulls compared with traditional minimum predation rate methods, which do not account for deposition probabilities. Results supported previous findings on the high predation impacts from strictly piscivorous waterbirds nesting in the Columbia River estuary (i.e., terns and cormorants), but our findings also revealed greater impacts of a generalist predator species (i.e., California gulls) than were previously documented. Approaches used in this study allow for direct comparisons among multiple fish mortality factors and considerably improve the reliability of tag recovery models for estimating predation probabilities in multiple-predator systems.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Hostetter, N. J., Evans, A. F., Cramer, B. M., Collis, K., Lyons, D. E., & Roby, D. D. (2015). Quantifying Avian Predation on Fish Populations: Integrating Predator-Specific Deposition Probabilities in Tag Recovery Studies. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 144(2), 410-422. doi:10.1080/00028487.2014.988882
Series
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2015-05-15T15:01:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 LyonsDonaldFisheriesWildlifeQuantifyingAvianPredation.pdf: 595828 bytes, checksum: 1755992a5cef0e9689469762ddafc8a9 (MD5) LyonsDonaldFisheriesWildlifeQuantifyingAvianPredation_SupplementalMaterial.pdf: 71133 bytes, checksum: d6b9f8c2719dfa10ace8f4dcd168615a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Erin Clark(erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-05-15T15:01:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 LyonsDonaldFisheriesWildlifeQuantifyingAvianPredation.pdf: 595828 bytes, checksum: 1755992a5cef0e9689469762ddafc8a9 (MD5) LyonsDonaldFisheriesWildlifeQuantifyingAvianPredation_SupplementalMaterial.pdf: 71133 bytes, checksum: d6b9f8c2719dfa10ace8f4dcd168615a (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Erin Clark (erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-05-15T15:01:41Z No. of bitstreams: 2 LyonsDonaldFisheriesWildlifeQuantifyingAvianPredation.pdf: 595828 bytes, checksum: 1755992a5cef0e9689469762ddafc8a9 (MD5) LyonsDonaldFisheriesWildlifeQuantifyingAvianPredation_SupplementalMaterial.pdf: 71133 bytes, checksum: d6b9f8c2719dfa10ace8f4dcd168615a (MD5)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 07/27/2017 Default
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items