Article

 

Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/j6731555w

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • Background: The language of “participant-driven research,” “crowdsourcing” and “citizen science” is increasingly being used to encourage the public to become involved in research ventures as both subjects and scientists. Originally, these labels were invoked by volunteer research efforts propelled by amateurs outside of traditional research institutions and aimed at appealing to those looking for more “democratic,” “patient-centric,” or “lay” alternatives to the professional science establishment. As mainstream translational biomedical research requires increasingly larger participant pools, however, corporate, academic and governmental research programs are embracing this populist rhetoric to encourage wider public participation. Discussion: We examine the ethical and social implications of this recruitment strategy. We begin by surveying examples of “citizen science” outside of biomedicine, as paradigmatic of the aspirations this democratizing rhetoric was originally meant to embody. Next, we discuss the ways these aspirations become articulated in the biomedical context, with a view to drawing out the multiple and potentially conflicting meanings of “public engagement” when citizens are also the subjects of the science. We then illustrate two uses of public engagement rhetoric to gain public support for national biomedical research efforts: its post-hoc use in the “care.data” project of the National Health Service in England, and its proactive uses in the “Precision Medicine Initiative” of the United States White House. These examples will serve as the basis for a normative analysis, discussing the potential ethical and social ramifications of this rhetoric. Summary: We pay particular attention to the implications of government strategies that cultivate the idea that members of the public have a civic duty to participate in government-sponsored research initiatives. We argue that such initiatives should draw from policy frameworks that support normative analysis of the role of citizenry. And, we conclude it is imperative to make visible and clear the full spectrum of meanings of “citizen science,” the contexts in which it is used, and its demands with respect to participation, engagement, and governance.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Woolley, J. P., McGowan, M. L., Teare, H. J., Coathup, V., Fishman, J. R., Settersten, R. A., ... & Juengst, E. T. (2016). Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives. BMC Medical Ethics, 17, 33. doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1
Journal Title
Journal Volume
  • 17
Academic Affiliation
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • Support for JPW's contributions to this paper was provided through a fellowship by Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, and through a Visiitorship at the Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, Nuffield Department of Population Health.Support for MM's contributions to this paper was provided by the National Human Genome Research Institute of the U.S. National Institutes of Health through research grant # R01 HG005277.
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-29T16:28:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 krauserp1356636055.zip: 661509 bytes, checksum: 73d8480309fb346b512bd274f3f55125 (MD5) WooleyCitizenScienceorScientific.pdf: 866958 bytes, checksum: e66d64cd0d17e0172bf8641460a72140 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-06-04
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Patricia Black(patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2016-06-29T16:28:38Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 krauserp1356636055.zip: 661509 bytes, checksum: 73d8480309fb346b512bd274f3f55125 (MD5) WooleyCitizenScienceorScientific.pdf: 866958 bytes, checksum: e66d64cd0d17e0172bf8641460a72140 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Open Access (openaccess@library.oregonstate.edu) on 2016-06-27T16:58:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 WooleyCitizenScienceorScientific.pdf: 866958 bytes, checksum: e66d64cd0d17e0172bf8641460a72140 (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items