The effect of spatial configuration of habitat capacity on β diversity Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/ks65hf37d

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the author(s) and published by the Ecological Society of America. The published article can be found at:  http://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%292150-8925/

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Alternative Title
  • The effect of spatial configuration of habitat capacity on beta diversity
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Patterns of β diversity are commonly used to infer underlying ecological processes. In this study, we examined the effect of spatial configuration of habitat capacity on different metrics of β diversity, i.e., β diversity measured as turnover and as variation. For β diversity as turnover, a monotonic species spatial turnover pattern is typically considered as a benchmark for species distributions driven only by dispersal process. Deviations from a monotonic curve are attributed to local environmental filtering (i.e., the same environmental factors affecting different species differently). However, we found non-monotonicity in species spatial turnover in models without environmental filtering effect. This non-monotonicity was caused by variation in α diversity, introduced by spatial configuration of habitat capacity. After applying a recent null-model approach—designed to tease out the effect of variation in α diversity—species spatial turnover remained non-monotonic. This non-monotonicity makes it problematic to use species spatial turnover to infer the underlying processes for species distribution, i.e., whether it is driven by environmental filtering or dispersal processes. Spatial configuration of habitat capacity also influences landscape connectivity. Small-habitat capacity sites may constrain movements of organisms (i.e., dispersal) between sites supporting high capacity habitats. We showed that in a landscape where small-habitat capacity sites were located in positions important for dispersal (e.g., in the center as opposed to on the edge of a landscape) has a higher spatial variation of species composition, hence, higher β diversity. Ecologists who use different measures of β diversity should be aware of these effects introduced by spatial configuration of habitat capacity.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Dong, X., Muneepeerakul, R., Olden, J. D., & Lytle, D. A. (2015). The effect of spatial configuration of habitat capacity on β diversity. Ecosphere, 6(11), 220. doi:10.1890/ES14-00497.1
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Patricia Black (patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2016-01-22T16:02:41Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1370 bytes, checksum: cd1af5ab51bcc7a5280cf305303530e9 (MD5) LytleDIntegrativeBioEffectSpatialConfiguration.pdf: 1851666 bytes, checksum: 88966666e59383ff471b0ebd9ff591b5 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Patricia Black(patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2016-01-22T16:03:04Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1370 bytes, checksum: cd1af5ab51bcc7a5280cf305303530e9 (MD5) LytleDIntegrativeBioEffectSpatialConfiguration.pdf: 1851666 bytes, checksum: 88966666e59383ff471b0ebd9ff591b5 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-22T16:03:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1370 bytes, checksum: cd1af5ab51bcc7a5280cf305303530e9 (MD5) LytleDIntegrativeBioEffectSpatialConfiguration.pdf: 1851666 bytes, checksum: 88966666e59383ff471b0ebd9ff591b5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-11

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items