Going with the flow or against the grain? The promise of vegetation for protecting beaches, dunes, and barrier islands from erosion Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/mk61rj65g

This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the Ecological Society of America and can be found at:  http://www.esajournals.org/loi/fron.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Coastlines have traditionally been engineered to maintain structural stability and to protect property from storm-related damage, but their ability to endure will be challenged over the next century. The use of vegetation to reduce erosion on ocean-facing mainland and barrier island shorelines – including the sand dunes and beaches on these islands – could be part of a more flexible strategy. Although there is growing enthusiasm for using vegetation for this purpose, empirical data supporting this approach are lacking. Here, we identify the potential roles of vegetation in coastal protection, including the capture of sediment, ecological succession, and the building of islands, dunes, and beaches; the development of wave-resistant soils by increasing effective grain size and sedimentary cohesion; the ability of aboveground architecture to attenuate waves and impede through-flow; the capability of roots to bind sediments subjected to wave action; and the alteration of coastline resiliency by plant structures and genetic traits. We conclude that ecological and engineering practices must be combined in order to develop a sustainable, realistic, and integrated coastal protection strategy.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Feagin, R. A., Figlus, J., Zinnert, J. C., Sigren, J., Martínez, M. L., Silva, R., ... & Carter, G. (2015). Going with the flow or against the grain? The promise of vegetation for protecting beaches, dunes, and barrier islands from erosion. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13(4), 203-210. doi:10.1890/140218
Series
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2015-06-10T18:18:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CoxDanielCivilConstructEngGoingWithFlow.pdf: 2232271 bytes, checksum: a496f4c1e7c9be82162276595fda9a95 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-05
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Erin Clark(erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-06-10T18:18:34Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 CoxDanielCivilConstructEngGoingWithFlow.pdf: 2232271 bytes, checksum: a496f4c1e7c9be82162276595fda9a95 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Erin Clark (erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-06-10T18:18:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CoxDanielCivilConstructEngGoingWithFlow.pdf: 2232271 bytes, checksum: a496f4c1e7c9be82162276595fda9a95 (MD5)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 07/26/2017

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items