In defense of P values Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/mp48sf61w

This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the Ecological Society of America and can be found at:  http://www.esajournals.org/loi/ecol.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Statistical hypothesis testing has been widely criticized by ecologists in recent years. I review some of the more persistent criticisms of P values and argue that most stem from misunderstandings or incorrect interpretations, rather than from intrinsic shortcomings of the P value. I show that P values are intimately linked to confidence intervals and to differences in Akaike’s information criterion (ΔAIC), two metrics that have been advocated as replacements for the P value. The choice of a threshold value of ΔAIC that breaks ties among competing models is as arbitrary as the choice of the probability of a Type I error in hypothesis testing, and several other criticisms of the P value apply equally to ΔAIC. Since P values, confidence intervals, and ΔAIC are based on the same statistical information, all have their places in modern statistical practice. The choice of which to use should be stylistic, dictated by details of the application rather than by dogmatic, a priori considerations.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Murtaugh, P. A. (2014). In defense of P values. Ecology, 95:611–617. doi:10.1890/13-0590.1
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Erin Clark (erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2014-06-23T16:23:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MurtaughPaulStatisticsDefensePValues.pdf: 366943 bytes, checksum: 59b881d54babdfa354cf5c3f64d8806a (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-23T16:24:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MurtaughPaulStatisticsDefensePValues.pdf: 366943 bytes, checksum: 59b881d54babdfa354cf5c3f64d8806a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-03
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Erin Clark(erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2014-06-23T16:24:06Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MurtaughPaulStatisticsDefensePValues.pdf: 366943 bytes, checksum: 59b881d54babdfa354cf5c3f64d8806a (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items