Article
 

In defense of P values

Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/mp48sf61w

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • Statistical hypothesis testing has been widely criticized by ecologists in recent years. I review some of the more persistent criticisms of P values and argue that most stem from misunderstandings or incorrect interpretations, rather than from intrinsic shortcomings of the P value. I show that P values are intimately linked to confidence intervals and to differences in Akaike’s information criterion (ΔAIC), two metrics that have been advocated as replacements for the P value. The choice of a threshold value of ΔAIC that breaks ties among competing models is as arbitrary as the choice of the probability of a Type I error in hypothesis testing, and several other criticisms of the P value apply equally to ΔAIC. Since P values, confidence intervals, and ΔAIC are based on the same statistical information, all have their places in modern statistical practice. The choice of which to use should be stylistic, dictated by details of the application rather than by dogmatic, a priori considerations.
  • This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the Ecological Society of America and can be found at: http://www.esajournals.org/loi/ecol.
  • Keywords: P value, AIC, Confidence interval, Null hypothesis, Significance testing
  • Keywords: P value, AIC, Confidence interval, Null hypothesis, Significance testing
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Murtaugh, P. A. (2014). In defense of P values. Ecology, 95:611–617. doi:10.1890/13-0590.1
Journal Title
Journal Volume
  • 95
Journal Issue/Number
  • 3
Rights Statement
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
file details MurtaughPaulStatisticsDefensePValues.pdf 2017-07-25 Public Download