A national survey of managed honey bee 2013-2014 annual colony losses in the USA Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/n009w3884

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the author(s) and published by Springer. The published article can be found at:  http://www.apidologie.org/

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Honey bee colony losses are a major concern in the USA and across the globe. Long-term data on losses are critical for putting yearly losses in context. US colony loss surveys have been conducted yearly since the winter of 2006–2007. Here, we report the results from the eighth annual survey on winter losses and the second annual survey of summer and annual losses. There were 7425 valid respondents (7123 backyard, 190 sideline, and 112 commercial beekeepers) managing 497,855 colonies, 19 % of the total US colonies. Total losses reported were 19.8% [95% CI 19.3–20.3 %] over the summer, 23.7 % [95% CI 23.3–24.1 %] over the winter, and 34.1 % [95 % CI 33.6–34.6 %] for the whole year. Average losses were 15.1 % [95 % CI 14.5–15.7 %] over the summer, 44.8 % [95 % CI 43.9–45.7 %] over the winter, and 51.1 % [95 % CI 50.2–51.6 %] for the whole year. While total winter loss was one of the lowest reported in 8 years, 66%of all beekeepers had higher losses than they deemed acceptable.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Lee, K. V., Steinhauer, N., Rennich, K., Wilson, M. E., Tarpy, D. R., Caron, D. M., ... & Sagili, R. (2015). A national survey of managed honey bee 2013–2014 annual colony losses in the USA. Apidologie, 46(3), 292-305. doi:10.1007/s13592-015-0356-z
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Patricia Black(patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-06-23T16:44:13Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 CaronDeweyHortNationalSurveyManaged.pdf: 663792 bytes, checksum: 455d1f2df1b218ebe064587e56a3e73b (MD5) CaronDeweyHortNationalSurveyManagedSupplementaryMaterial.pdf: 895732 bytes, checksum: d246c9276be401ecfde33a9f3575024d (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2015-06-23T16:44:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 CaronDeweyHortNationalSurveyManaged.pdf: 663792 bytes, checksum: 455d1f2df1b218ebe064587e56a3e73b (MD5) CaronDeweyHortNationalSurveyManagedSupplementaryMaterial.pdf: 895732 bytes, checksum: d246c9276be401ecfde33a9f3575024d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-05
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Patricia Black (patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-06-23T16:43:20Z No. of bitstreams: 2 CaronDeweyHortNationalSurveyManaged.pdf: 663792 bytes, checksum: 455d1f2df1b218ebe064587e56a3e73b (MD5) CaronDeweyHortNationalSurveyManagedSupplementaryMaterial.pdf: 895732 bytes, checksum: d246c9276be401ecfde33a9f3575024d (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified Default

Items