Designing a Monitoring Program to Estimate Estuarine Survival of Anadromous Salmon Smolts: Simulating the Effect of Sample Design on Inference Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/p2676x087

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The article was published by the Public Library of Science and is in the public domain. The published article can be found at:  http://www.plosone.org/.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • A number of researchers have attempted to estimate salmonid smolt survival during outmigration through an estuary. However, it is currently unclear how the design of such studies influences the accuracy and precision of survival estimates. In this simulation study we consider four patterns of smolt survival probability in the estuary, and test the performance of several different sampling strategies for estimating estuarine survival assuming perfect detection. The four survival probability patterns each incorporate a systematic component (constant, linearly increasing, increasing and then decreasing, and two pulses) and a random component to reflect daily fluctuations in survival probability. Generally, spreading sampling effort (tagging) across the season resulted in more accurate estimates of survival. All sampling designs in this simulation tended to under-estimate the variation in the survival estimates because seasonal and daily variation in survival probability are not incorporated in the estimation procedure. This under-estimation results in poorer performance of estimates from larger samples. Thus, tagging more fish may not result in better estimates of survival if important components of variation are not accounted for. The results of our simulation incorporate survival probabilities and run distribution data from previous studies to help illustrate the tradeoffs among sampling strategies in terms of the number of tags needed and distribution of tagging effort. This information will assist researchers in developing improved monitoring programs and encourage discussion regarding issues that should be addressed prior to implementation of any telemetry-based monitoring plan. We believe implementation of an effective estuary survival monitoring program will strengthen the robustness of life cycle models used in recovery plans by providing missing data on where and how much mortality occurs in the riverine and estuarine portions of smolt migration. These data could result in better informed management decisions and assist in guidance for more effective estuarine restoration projects.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Romer, J. D., Gitelman, A. I., Clements, S., & Schreck, C. B. (2015). Designing a Monitoring Program to Estimate Estuarine Survival of Anadromous Salmon Smolts: Simulating the Effect of Sample Design on Inference. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0132912. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132912
Series
Rights Statement
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2015-08-21T18:52:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 license_rdf: 1089 bytes, checksum: 0a703d871bf062c5fdc7850b1496693b (MD5) RomerJeremyFishWildlifeDesigningMonitoringProgram.pdf: 776533 bytes, checksum: 45415898640d43ff3f96777c73066030 (MD5) RomerJeremyFishWildlifeDesigningMonitoringProgramSupportingInformationFigureS1.pdf: 1075023 bytes, checksum: d04628b2dc18d53b0618702b84ed9f5e (MD5) RomerJeremyFishWildlifeDesigningMonitoringProgramSupportingInformationTextS1.pdf: 35104 bytes, checksum: 978dd57e23d596021199d866176ccce3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-07-21
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Patricia Black(patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-08-21T18:52:30Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 4 license_rdf: 1089 bytes, checksum: 0a703d871bf062c5fdc7850b1496693b (MD5) RomerJeremyFishWildlifeDesigningMonitoringProgram.pdf: 776533 bytes, checksum: 45415898640d43ff3f96777c73066030 (MD5) RomerJeremyFishWildlifeDesigningMonitoringProgramSupportingInformationFigureS1.pdf: 1075023 bytes, checksum: d04628b2dc18d53b0618702b84ed9f5e (MD5) RomerJeremyFishWildlifeDesigningMonitoringProgramSupportingInformationTextS1.pdf: 35104 bytes, checksum: 978dd57e23d596021199d866176ccce3 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Patricia Black (patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-08-21T18:52:14Z No. of bitstreams: 4 license_rdf: 1089 bytes, checksum: 0a703d871bf062c5fdc7850b1496693b (MD5) RomerJeremyFishWildlifeDesigningMonitoringProgram.pdf: 776533 bytes, checksum: 45415898640d43ff3f96777c73066030 (MD5) RomerJeremyFishWildlifeDesigningMonitoringProgramSupportingInformationFigureS1.pdf: 1075023 bytes, checksum: d04628b2dc18d53b0618702b84ed9f5e (MD5) RomerJeremyFishWildlifeDesigningMonitoringProgramSupportingInformationTextS1.pdf: 35104 bytes, checksum: 978dd57e23d596021199d866176ccce3 (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified Default