Stream biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates around the globe: a comparison of large-scale programs Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/q524jq62x

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by Springer and can be found at:  http://link.springer.com/journal/10661.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Water quality agencies and scientists are increasingly adopting standardized sampling methodologies because of the challenges associated with interpreting data derived from dissimilar protocols. Here, we compare 13 protocols for monitoring streams from different regions and countries around the globe. Despite the spatially diverse range of countries assessed, many aspects of bioassessment structure and protocols were similar, thereby providing evidence of key characteristics that might be incorporated in a global sampling methodology. Similarities were found regarding sampler type, mesh size, sampling period, subsampling methods, and taxonomic resolution. Consistent field and laboratory methods are essential for merging data sets collected by multiple institutions to enable large-scale comparisons. We discuss the similarities and differences among protocols and present current trends and future recommendations for monitoring programs, especially for regions where large-scale protocols do not yet exist. We summarize the current state in one of these regions, Latin America, and comment on the possible development path for these techniques in this region. We conclude that several aspects of stream biomonitoring need additional performance evaluation (accuracy, precision, discriminatory power, relative costs), particularly when comparing targeted habitat (only the commonest habitat type) versus site-wide sampling (multiple habitat types), appropriate levels of sampling and processing effort, and standardized indicators to resolve dissimilarities among biomonitoring methods. Global issues such as climate change are creating an environment where there is an increasing need to have universally consistent data collection, processing and storage to enable large-scale trend analysis. Biomonitoring programs following standardized methods could aid international data sharing and interpretation.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Buss, D. F., Carlisle, D. M., Chon, T. S., Culp, J., Harding, J. S., Keizer-Vlek, H. E., ... & Hughes, R. M. (2014). Stream biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates around the globe: a comparison of large-scale programs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(1), 4132. doi:10.1007/s10661-014-4132-8
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-23T22:48:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 HughesRobertFisheriesWildlifeStreamBiomonitoring.pdf: 700617 bytes, checksum: 802d492a24bd4196c05d2fc2f8a8a76f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-12-09
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Erin Clark (erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-04-23T22:48:17Z No. of bitstreams: 1 HughesRobertFisheriesWildlifeStreamBiomonitoring.pdf: 700617 bytes, checksum: 802d492a24bd4196c05d2fc2f8a8a76f (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Erin Clark(erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-04-23T22:48:30Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 HughesRobertFisheriesWildlifeStreamBiomonitoring.pdf: 700617 bytes, checksum: 802d492a24bd4196c05d2fc2f8a8a76f (MD5)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 07/27/2017

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items