A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/qz20sv15m

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by American Geophysical Union and can be found at:  http://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/agu/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%291944-7973/

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • This work advances a unified approach to process-based hydrologic modeling, which we term the ‘‘Structure for Unifying Multiple Modeling Alternatives (SUMMA).’’ The modeling framework, introduced in the companion paper, uses a general set of conservation equations with flexibility in the choice of process parameterizations (closure relationships) and spatial architecture. This second paper specifies the model equations and their spatial approximations, describes the hydrologic and biophysical process parameterizations currently supported within the framework, and illustrates how the framework can be used in conjunction with multivariate observations to identify model improvements and future research and data needs. The case studies illustrate the use of SUMMA to select among competing modeling approaches based on both observed data and theoretical considerations. Specific examples of preferable modeling approaches include the use of physiological methods to estimate stomatal resistance, careful specification of the shape of the within-canopy and below-canopy wind profile, explicitly accounting for dust concentrations within the snowpack, and explicitly representing distributed lateral flow processes. Results also demonstrate that changes in parameter values can make as much or more difference to the model predictions than changes in the process representation. This emphasizes that improvements in model fidelity require a sagacious choice of both process parameterizations and model parameters. In conclusion, we envisage that SUMMA can facilitate ongoing model development efforts, the diagnosis and correction of model structural errors, and improved characterization of model uncertainty.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Clark, M. P., Nijssen, B., Lundquist, J. D., Kavetski, D., Rupp, D. E., Woods, R. A., ... & Marks, D. G. (2015). A unified approach for process‐based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies. Water Resources Research, 51(4), 2515-2542. doi:10.1002/2015WR017200
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-21T16:56:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RuppDavidCEOASUnifiedApproachProcess.pdf: 1955823 bytes, checksum: 52d68ad31814922daddeb9da68cd40be (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Patricia Black (patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-07-21T16:55:52Z No. of bitstreams: 1 RuppDavidCEOASUnifiedApproachProcess.pdf: 1955823 bytes, checksum: 52d68ad31814922daddeb9da68cd40be (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Patricia Black(patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-07-21T16:56:22Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 RuppDavidCEOASUnifiedApproachProcess.pdf: 1955823 bytes, checksum: 52d68ad31814922daddeb9da68cd40be (MD5)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 07/26/2017

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items