Article

 

A national survey of managed honey bee 2012-2013 annual colony losses in the USA: results from the Bee Informed Partnership Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/r494vn011

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the International Bee Research Association and can be found at:  http://www.ibra.org.uk/categories/jar.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • For the past six years in which overwintering mortality of honey bee colonies has been surveyed in the USA, estimates of colony loss have fluctuated around one-third of the national population. Here we report on the losses for the 2012-2013 seasons. We collected data from 6,482 US beekeepers (6,114 backyard, 233 sideline, and 135 commercial beekeepers) to document overwintering mortality rates of honey bee colonies for the USA. Responding beekeepers reported a total 30.6% (95% CI: 30.16-31.13%) loss of US colonies over the winter, with each beekeeper losing on average 44.8% (95% CI: 43.88-45.66%) of their colonies. Total winter losses varied across states (range: 11.0% to 54.7%). The self-reported level of acceptable winter loss was 14.6%, and 73.2% of the respondents had mortality rates greater than this level. The leading self-identified causes of overwintering mortality were different according to the operation type; backyard beekeepers generally self-identified “manageable” factors (e.g., starvation, weak colony in the fall), while commercial beekeepers generally identified non-manageable factors (e.g., queen failure, pesticides) as the main cause of losses. For the first time in this series of surveys, we estimated mortality during the summer (total loss = 25.3% (95% CI: 24.80-25.74%), average loss = 12.5% (95% CI: 11.92-13.06%)). The entire 12-months period between April 2012 and April 2013 yielded a total loss of 45.2% (95% CI: 44.58-45.75%), and an average loss of 49.4% (95% CI: 48.46-50.43%). While we found that commercial beekeepers lost fewer colonies than backyard beekeepers in the winter (30.2% (95% CI: 26.54-33.93% vs 45.4% (44.46-46.32%) respectively), the situation was reversed in the summer where commercial beekeepers reported higher average losses than backyard beekeepers (21.6% (95% CI: 18.4-24.79%) vs 12.1% (11.46-12.65%)). These findings demonstrate the ongoing difficulties of US beekeepers in maintaining overall colony heath and survival.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Steinhauer, N. A., Rennich, K., Wilson, M. E., Caron, D. M., Lengerich, E. J., Pettis, J. S., ... & Vanengelsdorp, D. (2014). A national survey of managed honey bee 2012-2013 annual colony losses in the USA: results from the Bee Informed Partnership. Journal of Apicultural Research, 53, 1-18. doi:10.3896/IBRA.1.53.1.01
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • This project was funded by a CAP grant from USDA-NIFA: the Bee Informed Partnership and includes, in addition to several of the authors, Kathy Baylis, Joseph Connell, Keith Delaplane, Susan Donohue, Wayne Esaias, Marla Spivak, Robyn Underwood, and the USDA-ARS Area wide Program on Bee Health.
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Erin Clark (erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2014-06-30T17:46:13Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CaronDeweyHorticultureNationalSurveyManaged.pdf: 1312285 bytes, checksum: 6f0b57259c55ccaf61e8bb6c093da76a (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-30T17:46:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CaronDeweyHorticultureNationalSurveyManaged.pdf: 1312285 bytes, checksum: 6f0b57259c55ccaf61e8bb6c093da76a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-02-26
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Erin Clark(erin.clark@oregonstate.edu) on 2014-06-30T17:46:28Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 CaronDeweyHorticultureNationalSurveyManaged.pdf: 1312285 bytes, checksum: 6f0b57259c55ccaf61e8bb6c093da76a (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items