Barriers and Strategies to an Iterative Model of Advance Care Planning Communication Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/s1784n301

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the author(s) and published by SAGE Publications. The published article can be found at:  https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/american-journal-of-hospice-and-palliative-medicine%C2%AE/journal201797

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Background: Early and repeated patient–provider conversations about advance care planning (ACP) are now widely recommended. We sought to characterize barriers and strategies for realizing an iterative model of ACP patient–provider communication. Methods: A total of 2 multidisciplinary focus groups and 3 semistructured interviews with 20 providers at a large Veterans Affairs medical center. Thematic analysis was employed to identify salient themes. Results: Barriers included variation among providers in approaches to ACP, lack of useful information about patient values to guide decision making, and ineffective communication between providers across settings. Strategies included eliciting patient values rather than specific treatment choices and an increased role for primary care in the ACP process. Conclusions: Greater attention to connecting providers across the continuum, maximizing the potential of the electronic health record, and linking patient experiences to their values may help to connect ACP communication across the continuum.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Ahluwalia, S. C., Bekelman, D. B., Huynh, A. K., Prendergast, T. J., Shreve, S., & Lorenz, K. A. (2015). Barriers and strategies to an iterative model of advance care planning communication. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 32(8), 817-823. doi:10.1177/1049909114541513
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2015-12-10T16:28:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ahluwalia SangeetaPublicHealthHumanSciBarriersStrategiesIterative.pdf: 315991 bytes, checksum: a8572717c1898e02438b090e7ce1000c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Patricia Black(patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-12-10T16:28:39Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Ahluwalia SangeetaPublicHealthHumanSciBarriersStrategiesIterative.pdf: 315991 bytes, checksum: a8572717c1898e02438b090e7ce1000c (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Patricia Black (patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-12-10T16:28:12Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Ahluwalia SangeetaPublicHealthHumanSciBarriersStrategiesIterative.pdf: 315991 bytes, checksum: a8572717c1898e02438b090e7ce1000c (MD5)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 07/26/2017

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items