Article

 

Comparison of Ceilometer, Satellite, and Synoptic Measurements of Boundary-Layer Cloudiness and the ECMWF Diagnostic Cloud Parameterization Scheme during ASTEX Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/sb3979755

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • Cloud fraction is a widely used parameter for estimating the effects of boundary-layer cloud on radiative transfer. During the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment (ASTEX) during June 1992, ceilometer and satellite-based measurements of boundary-layer cloud fraction were made in the subtropical North Atlantic, a region typified by a 1–2 km deep marine boundary layer with cumulus clouds rising into a broken stratocumulus layer underneath an inversion. Both the diurnal cycle and day-to-day variations in low-cloud fraction are examined. It is shown that ECMWF low cloudiness analyses do not correlate with the observed variations in cloudiness and substantially underestimate the mean low cloudiness. In these analyses, the parameterization of low cloud fraction is primarily based on the inversion strength. A comparison of ECMWF analyses and ASTEX soundings (most of which were assimilated into the analyses) shows that the thermodynamic structure of the boundary layer and the inversion strength are well represented (with some small but significant systematic biases) in the analyses and preserved (again with some biases) in 5-day forecasts. However, even when applied to the actual sounding the ECMWF low cloud scheme cannot predict the observed day-to-day variations or the diurnal cycle in low cloud. Other diagnostic schemes based on lower tropospheric stability, cloud-top entrainment instability, boundary-layer depth, and vertical motion do equally poorly. The only successful predictor of low cloud frontier from sounding information is the relative humidity in the upper part of the boundary layer.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Bretherton, Christopher S., E. Klinker, A. K. Betts, J. A. Coakley, 1995: Comparison of Ceilometer, Satellite, and Synoptic Measurements of Boundary-Layer Cloudiness and the ECMWF Diagnostic Cloud Parameterization Scheme during ASTEX. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 52(16), 2736–2751.
Journal Title
Journal Volume
  • 52
Journal Issue/Number
  • 16
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • This work was partly supported by ONR Grants N00014-90-J-1136 and N00014-90-J-1480. A. K. Betts was supported by NASA under Contract NAS5-31738 and NSF under Grant ATM9001960.
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Sue Kunda(sue.kunda@oregonstate.edu) on 2011-12-30T17:19:59Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 CoakleyJA.CEOAS.ComparisonOfCeilometer.pdf: 1396177 bytes, checksum: e7b64f38a6d57773395b8a051ff65c92 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2011-12-30T17:19:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CoakleyJA.CEOAS.ComparisonOfCeilometer.pdf: 1396177 bytes, checksum: e7b64f38a6d57773395b8a051ff65c92 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1995-08
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Deborah Campbell (deborah.campbell@oregonstate.edu) on 2011-12-07T17:39:03Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CoakleyJA.CEOAS.ComparisonOfCeilometer.pdf: 1396177 bytes, checksum: e7b64f38a6d57773395b8a051ff65c92 (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Items