High-pressure Processing: Kinetic Models for Microbial and Enzyme Inactivation Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF


Attribute NameValues
  • High pressure processing (HPP) has become the most widely accepted nonthermal food preservation technology. The pressure range for commercial processes is typically around 100-600 MPa, whereas moderate temperature (up to 65°C) may be used to increase microbial and enzymatic inactivation levels. However, these industrial processing conditions are insufficient to achieve sterilization since much higher pressure levels (>1000 MPa) would be required to inactivate bacterial endospores and enzymes of importance in food preservation. The next generation of commercial pressure processing units will operate at about 90-120°C and 600-800 MPa for treatments defined as Pressure Assisted Thermal Processing (PATP), or Pressure Assisted Thermal Sterilization (PATS) if the commercial food sterilization level required is achieved. Most published HPP kinetic studies have focused only on pressure effects on the microbial load and enzyme activity in foods and model systems. Published work on primary and secondary models to predict simultaneously the effect of pressure and temperature on microbial and enzymatic inactivation kinetics is still incomplete. Moreover, few references provide a detailed and complete analysis of theoretical, empirical, and semi-empirical basis for the kinetic models proposed to predict the level of microbial and enzyme inactivation achieved. This review organizes these published kinetic models according to the approach used, and then presents an in-depth and critical revision to define the modeling research needed to provide commercial users with the computational tools needed to develop and optimize pasteurization and sterilization pressure treatments.
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
  • Serment-Moreno, V., Barbosa-Cánovas, G., Torres, J. A., & Welti-Chanes, J. (2014). High-pressure Processing: Kinetic Models for Microbial and Enzyme Inactivation. Food Engineering Reviews, 6(3), 56-88. doi:10.1007/s12393-014-9075-x
Journal Title
Journal Volume
  • 6
Journal Issue/Number
  • 3
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • The authors acknowledge the support from the Tecnológico de Monterrey (Research chair funds CAT 200), México’s CONACYT Scholarship Program, and Formula Grants no. 2011-31200-06041 and 2012-31200-06041 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.
Peer Reviewed



This work has no parents.