Do conventional prescriptions of the rights-based fishing literature pose legal and political impediments to policy change? Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/conference_proceedings_or_journals/6395w8404

Research Paper

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • A serious impediment blocks advancement of individual transferable quota (ITQ) policy in the United States, particularly in North Pacific fisheries being considered for ITQ management. The traditional ITQ design, that allocates rights to only the harvesting sector, unintentionally expropriates wealth/property interests from the co-dependent-processing sector. This regulatory expropriation is a substantive policy flaw that renders the traditional ITQ design constitutionally suspect and subject to attack in the courts on grounds that such policy would require "just compensation" under the Fifth Amendment. The expropriation mechanism is briefly outlined following a reflective glance at the origins of ITQ policy. Then, this expropriating ITQ policy is shown to be at opposing purposes with, and even partially induced by, prior to government fishery policies. Finally, arguments underlying a Fifth Amendment takings claim are set in the context of four strands of judicial precedent.
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Matulich, Scott C., Jim Macdonald. 1996. Do conventional prescriptions of the rights-based fishing literature pose legal and political impediments to policy change? Peer Review: No. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade, July 1-4, 1996, Marrakech, Morocco. Compiled by Ann L. Shriver. International Institute of Fisheries Economics & Trade, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, 2002. CD ROM.
Conference Name
Keyword
Subject
Rights Statement
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2015-10-02T23:09:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Do conventional prescriptions of the rights.pdf: 214275 bytes, checksum: 958b71222b62537bb5d0fc1528b94fd5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2002
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Katy Davis(kdscannerosu@gmail.com) on 2015-10-02T23:09:22Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Do conventional prescriptions of the rights.pdf: 214275 bytes, checksum: 958b71222b62537bb5d0fc1528b94fd5 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Katy Davis (kdscannerosu@gmail.com) on 2015-10-02T21:55:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Do conventional prescriptions of the rights.pdf: 214275 bytes, checksum: 958b71222b62537bb5d0fc1528b94fd5 (MD5)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 07/17/2017

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items