Conference Proceedings Or Journal

 

Exploring fisheries dynamics according to different quota governance mechanisms: application to the Bay of Biscay sole fishery Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/conference_proceedings_or_journals/8p58pf29c

Presentation

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • Integrating governance mechanisms into bio-economic modeling tools is a key challenge for the assessment of fisheries management plans. Impact assessments are carried out without considering real management options and institutional context. Only fishing mortality changes and their impact on fish stocks are considered. The Bay of Biscay sole fishery offers a good example to integrate current governance mechanisms for quota management - mainly relying on “fishery cooperatives” - and consequences of possible alternatives - market or centralized based approaches - especially in the context of the Common fisheries Policy reform. Based on a simulation bio-economic tools developed in cooperation with Bay of Biscay fisheries stakeholders, we explore the consequences of modeling different governance mechanisms options for quotas. The results are analyzed according to a set of multi-criteria indicators with the perspective of improving cost-effectiveness analysis in fisheries impact assessment.
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Bellanger, Manuel, M. Merzereaud, O. Guyader, C. Macher. 2014. Exploring fisheries dynamics according to different quota governance mechanisms: application to the Bay of Biscay sole fishery. In: Towards ecosystem based management of fisheries: what role can economics play?: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade, July 7-11, 2014, Brisbane, Australia. Complied by Ann L. Shriver & Melissa Errend. Corvallis, OR: International Institute of Fisheries.
Conference Name
Keyword
Subject
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • Fisheries Research & Development Corporation, World Wildlife Fund, MG Kailis Group, AquaFish Innovation Lab, NOAA Fisheries, The European Association of Fisheries Economists, Japan International Fisheries Research Society, United Nations University, NORAD
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Melissa Errend (melissa.errend@gmail.com) on 2015-02-18T20:28:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Bellanger et al IIFET 2014.pdf: 917491 bytes, checksum: 03c31bf0b169fbf983c7fc0d59c8e567 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2015-02-19T17:35:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Bellanger et al IIFET 2014.pdf: 917491 bytes, checksum: 03c31bf0b169fbf983c7fc0d59c8e567 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-07-07
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Susan Gilmont(susan.gilmont@orst.edu) on 2015-02-19T17:35:30Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Bellanger et al IIFET 2014.pdf: 917491 bytes, checksum: 03c31bf0b169fbf983c7fc0d59c8e567 (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

In Collection:

Items