A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/defaults/2z10wq572

This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the American Geophysical Union and can be found at:  http://www.agu.org/journals/jgr/. To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Accurately simulating gross primary productivity (GPP) in terrestrial ecosystem models is critical because errors in simulated GPP propagate through the model to introduce additional errors in simulated biomass and other fluxes. We evaluated simulated, daily average GPP from 26 models against estimated GPP at 39 eddy covariance flux tower sites across the United States and Canada. None of the models in this study match estimated GPP within observed uncertainty. On average, models overestimate GPP in winter, spring, and fall, and underestimate GPP in summer. Models overpredicted GPP under dry conditions and for temperatures below 0°C. Improvements in simulated soil moisture and ecosystem response to drought or humidity stress will improve simulated GPP under dry conditions. Adding a low-temperature response to shut down GPP for temperatures below 0°C will reduce the positive bias in winter, spring, and fall and improve simulated phenology. The negative bias in summer and poor overall performance resulted from mismatches between simulated and observed light use efficiency (LUE). Improving simulated GPP requires better leaf-to-canopy scaling and better values of model parameters that control the maximum potential GPP, such as ε[subscript max] (LUE), V[subscript cmax] (unstressed Rubisco catalytic capacity) or J[subscript max] (the maximum electron transport rate).
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Schaefer, K., et al. (2012), A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis, Journal of Geophysical Research, 117, G03010, doi:10.1029/2012JG001960.
Academic Affiliation
Series
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2012-08-27T21:00:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 LawBeverlyForestryModelDataComparison.pdf: 600461 bytes, checksum: 3f68057b2b09dfebb6b21ae190eb3349 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-07-19
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Deanne Bruner (deanne.bruner@oregonstate.edu) on 2012-08-24T23:35:13Z No. of bitstreams: 1 LawBeverlyForestryModelDataComparison.pdf: 600461 bytes, checksum: 3f68057b2b09dfebb6b21ae190eb3349 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Deanne Bruner(deanne.bruner@oregonstate.edu) on 2012-08-27T21:00:22Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 LawBeverlyForestryModelDataComparison.pdf: 600461 bytes, checksum: 3f68057b2b09dfebb6b21ae190eb3349 (MD5)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 07/07/2017

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items