Other Scholarly Content


Two coastal upwelling domains in the northern California Current system Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF


Attribute NameValues
  • A pair of hydrographic sections, one north and one south of Cape Blanco at 42.9N, was sampled in five summers (1998–2000 and 2002–2003). The NH line at 44.6N lies about 130 km south of the Columbia River, and spans a relatively wide shelf off Newport, Oregon. The CR line at 41.9N off Crescent City, California, lies 300 km farther south and spans a narrower shelf. Summer winds are predominantly southward in both locations but the southward winds are stronger on the CR line. Sampling included CTD/rosette casts (to measure temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, chlorophyll), zooplankton net tows and continuous operation of an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler. We summarize and compare July-August observations from the two locations. We find significant summer-season differences in the coastal upwelling domains north and south of Cape Blanco. Compared to the domain off Newport, the domain off Crescent City has a more saline, cooler, denser and thicker surface mixed layer, a wider coastal zone inshore of the upwelling front and jet, higher nutrient concentrations in the photic zone and higher phytoplankton biomass. The southward coastal jet lies near the coast (about 20–30 km offshore, over the shelf) on the NH line, but far from shore (about 120 km) on the CR line; a weak secondary jet lies near the shelf-break (35 km from shore) off Crescent City. Phytoplankton tend to be light-limited on the CR line and nutrient-limited on the NH line. Copepod biomass is high (15 mg C m-3) inshore of the mid-shelf on both NH and CR lines, and is also high in the core of the coastal jet off Crescent City. The CR line shows evidence of deep chlorophyll pockets that have been subducted from the surface layer. We attribute these significant differences to stronger mean southward wind stress over the southern domain, to strong small-scale wind stress curl in the lee of Cape Blanco, and to the reduced influence of the Columbia River discharge in this region.
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
  • Journal of Marine Research, 63, 901–929, 2005.
Table of Contents
  • 1) Introduction. 2) Methods: Sampling along paired hydrographic sections. 3) Results (Vertical distributions; Significant differences). 4) Discussion (Wind forcing; Fresh water advection; Biological processes, physical forcing and carbon export). 5) Conclusions.
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
  • Huyer, Fleischbein, Kosro, Smith, and Wheeler were supported by the National Science Foundation (Grants OCE-0000733 and OCE-0434810); Perlin was supported by the National Science Foundation (OCE-9907854) and by the Office of Naval Research (Grant N00014-01-0231); and Keister was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Grants NA86OP0589, NA17FE275 and NA17RJ1372).
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2009-11-17T23:04:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Huyer et al. 2005.pdf: 1599000 bytes, checksum: d23a8219f66d80131c91aff893b18636 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Linda Lamb(llamb@coas.oregonstate.edu) on 2009-11-17T23:04:43Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Huyer et al. 2005.pdf: 1599000 bytes, checksum: d23a8219f66d80131c91aff893b18636 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Linda Lamb (llamb@coas.oregonstate.edu) on 2009-11-12T16:44:42Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Huyer et al. 2005.pdf: 1599000 bytes, checksum: d23a8219f66d80131c91aff893b18636 (MD5)
  • 0022-2402



This work has no parents.