Other Scholarly Content


Class Standing and Success: Do Freshmen Have Lower Self-Efficacy & Goal Achievement for "Difficult" Goals? Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF


Attribute NameValues
  • Do freshmen achieve less of their personal and academic short-term goals in comparison to upperclassmen? Some may intuitively assume that due to age, or lack of experience, college freshmen would have lower perceived task-specific ability (self-efficacy) and actually achieve less (goal-completion ranging from 0% to 100%). Differences between various class-standing levels are compared in many contexts such as vocational competency & vocational purpose (e.g. Flowers, 2002). This study attempts to compare freshmen and upperclassmen on self-efficacy & goal achievement. Koestner, Lekes, Powers, and Chicoine (2002) found that self-efficacy negatively correlates with difficulty of self-set, short-term goals. More broadly, Schunk (1990) found that goal difficulty correlates negatively with initial doubts about goal attainment. Additionally, Mento, Locke, and Klein (1992) found that setting difficult performance goals is negatively correlated with attainment-expectations. Difficulty seems to be a crucial player in achievement of goals, and it sparked our interest in examining self-identified difficult goals. The purpose of the study was to investigate if there is a difference between freshmen and upperclassmen in: 1) Self-efficacy when pursuing difficult goals 2) Goal achievement when pursuing difficult goals
Resource Type
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Field
Conference Name
Conference Location
  • Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Academic Affiliation
Non-Academic Affiliation
Rights Statement
Peer Reviewed
Additional Information
  • Presented at Celebrating Undergraduate Excellence (CUE) at Oregon State University. Corvallis, Oregon. May 24th, 2018.



This work has no parents.

In Collection: