Comparison of stratified and non-stratified most similar neighbour imputation for estimating stand tables Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/defaults/ks65hc698

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Many growth and yield simulators require a stand table or tree-list to set the initial condition for projections in time. Most similar neighbour (MSN) approaches can be used for estimating stand tables from information commonly available on forest cover maps (e.g. height, volume, per cent canopy cover and species composition). Simulations were used to compare MSN (using an entire database) with two stratified MSN approaches. The first stratified MSN approach used species composition to partition the population into two inventory type strata, while the second stratified MSN approach used average stand age to partition the data into two stand development stages (strata). The MSN approach was used within the whole population and within each stratum to select a reference stand and to impute the ground variables of the reference stand to each target stand. Observed vs estimated stand tables were then compared for the stratified and non-stratified simulations. The imputation within a stratum did not result in better estimates than using the MSN approach within the whole population. Possible reasons for poor performance of stratified MSN are provided.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Eskelson, B.N.I, H. Temesgen, and T.M. Barrett. 2008. Comparison of Stratified and Non-stratified Most Similar Neighbour Imputation for Estimating Stand Tables. Forestry 81(2): 125-134, doi:10.1093/forestry/cpn003.
Academic Affiliation
Series
Rights Statement
Publisher
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Deborah Campbell(deborah.campbell@oregonstate.edu) on 2012-04-02T21:06:50Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Comparison of stratified and non-stratified most similar neighbour imputation for estimating stand tables.pdf: 1389373 bytes, checksum: 213e968f6daf8d2e84469985b757e4fe (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Logan Bernart (logan.bernart@gmail.com) on 2012-03-13T07:39:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Comparison of stratified and non-stratified most similar neighbour imputation for estimating stand tables.pdf: 1389373 bytes, checksum: 213e968f6daf8d2e84469985b757e4fe (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2012-04-02T21:06:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Comparison of stratified and non-stratified most similar neighbour imputation for estimating stand tables.pdf: 1389373 bytes, checksum: 213e968f6daf8d2e84469985b757e4fe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-04

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items