A comparison of selected parametric and imputation methods for estimating snag density and snag quality attributes Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/defaults/nk322f07c

To the best of our knowledge, one or more authors of this paper were federal employees when contributing to this work. Elsevier - Education Use Statement This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by Elsevier and can be found at:  http://www.elsevier.com/.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Snags (standing dead trees) are an essential structural component of forests. Because wildlife use of snags depends on size and decay stage, snag density estimation without any information about snag quality attributes is of little value for wildlife management decision makers. Little work has been done to develop models that allow multivariate estimation of snag density by snag quality class. Using climate, topography, Landsat TM data, stand age and forest type collected for 2356 forested Forest Inventory and Analysis plots in western Washington and western Oregon, we evaluated two multivariate techniques for their abilities to estimate density of snags by three decay classes. The density of live trees and snags in three decay classes (D1: recently dead, little decay; D2: decay, without top, some branches and bark missing; D3: extensive decay, missing bark and most branches) with diameter at breast height (DBH)P12.7 cm was estimated using a nonparametric random forest nearest neighbor imputation technique (RF) and a parametric two-stage model (QPORD), for which the number of trees per hectare was estimated with a Quasipoisson model in the first stage and the probability of belonging to a tree status class (live, D1, D2, D3) was estimated with an ordinal regression model in the second stage. The presence of large snags with DBHP50 cm was predicted using a logistic regression and RF imputation. Because of the more homogenous conditions on private forest lands, snag density by decay class was predicted with higher accuracies on private forest lands than on public lands, while presence of large snags was more accurately predicted on public lands, owing to the higher prevalence of large snags on public lands. RF outperformed the QPORD model in terms of percent accurate predictions, while QPORD provided smaller root mean square errors in predicting snag density by decay class. The logistic regression model achieved more accurate presence/absence classification of large snags than the RF imputation approach. Adjusting the decision threshold to account for unequal size for presence and absence classes is more straightforward for the logistic regression than for the RF imputation approach. Overall, model accuracies were poor in this study, which can be attributed to the poor predictive quality of the explanatory variables and the large range of forest types and geographic conditions observed in the data.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Eskelson, B., Temesgen, H., & Hagar, J. (2012). A comparison of selected parametric and imputation methods for estimating snag density and snag quality attributes. Forest Ecology and Management, 272, 26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.041
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Deborah Campbell(deborah.campbell@oregonstate.edu) on 2013-01-10T16:41:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 EskelsonBNIForestEngineeringResourcesManagementComparisonSelectedParametric.pdf: 673002 bytes, checksum: 540a9029164516f6fa4383127a6dc691 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2013-01-10T16:41:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 EskelsonBNIForestEngineeringResourcesManagementComparisonSelectedParametric.pdf: 673002 bytes, checksum: 540a9029164516f6fa4383127a6dc691 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-08-03
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Deborah Campbell (deborah.campbell@oregonstate.edu) on 2013-01-10T16:05:32Z No. of bitstreams: 1 EskelsonBNIForestEngineeringResourcesManagementComparisonSelectedParametric.pdf: 673002 bytes, checksum: 540a9029164516f6fa4383127a6dc691 (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items