Nutrient uptake in a stream affected by hydropower plants: comparison between stream channels and diversion canals Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/defaults/np193f954

This is an author's peer-reviewed final manuscript, as accepted by the publisher. The published article is copyrighted by Springer and can be found at:  http://link.springer.com/journal/10750.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Small hydropower plants divert part of the water from wide and physically complex stream channels with active hyporheic areas to narrow and hydraulically simple concrete canals, and thus, might affect nutrient dynamics. We compared nutrient uptake in diversion canals and in stream channels in the Leitzaran Stream (Basque Country, northern Spain). We hypothesized that simple morphology in diversion canals will result in lower nutrient uptake in canals than in stream channels. Periphytic chlorophyll and biomass did not differ significantly between reach types. Water was significantly deeper and faster in canals than in stream channels, but the transient storage zone did not differ significantly between reach types. There were no significant differences between uptake length for neither phosphate nor ammonium between reach types. Uptake length in both stream channels and diversion canals decreased with discharge, in a pattern similar to that previously described for pristine rivers across the world. Uptake velocity and uptake rate for phosphate did not differ significantly between reach types, but in the case of ammonium both retention metrics were significantly larger in the diversion canals. Results suggest that although hydropower schemes have minor effects on nutrient retention, these depend on the proportion of flow diverted.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Izagirre, O., Argerich, A., Martí, E., & Elosegi, A. (2013). Nutrient uptake in a stream affected by hydropower plants: Comparison between stream channels and diversion canals. Hydrobiologia, 712(1), 105-116. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1354-z
Academic Affiliation
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items