Comparative hazard assessment for protected species in a fire-prone landscape Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/defaults/pv63g075x

This is the author's peer-reviewed final manuscript, as accepted by the publisher. The published article is copyrighted by Elsevier and can be found at:  http://www.journals.elsevier.com/forest-ecology-and-management/.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • We conducted a comparative hazard assessment for 325,000 ha in a fire-prone area of southwest Oregon, USA. The landscape contains a variety of land ownerships, fire regimes, and management strategies. Our comparative hazard assessment evaluated the effects of two management strategies on crown fire potential and northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) conservation: (1) no action, and (2) active manipulation of hazardous fuels. Model simulations indicated that active management of sites with high fire hazard was more favorable to spotted owl conservation over the long term (75 years) than no management, given our modeling assumptions. Early in the model simulation, young seral stages were mostly responsible for high fire hazard, and active management in young stands tended to perpetuate that hazard. Later in the simulation, older seral stages accounted for most of the high fire hazard and active management could be used to ameliorate that hazard. At any given time period, ⩽8% of the landscape was identified for treatment. Fire hazard fluctuated over time depending on vegetation regeneration, maturation, and response to treatments. Active management resulted in greater numbers of potential spotted owl territories in lower fire hazard conditions, particularly during later years of our simulation. Our results support the contention that short term risks to protected species from active management can be less than longer term risk of no management in fire-prone landscapes. Thus, a short term, risk averse strategy for protected species in fire-prone landscapes may not be the best long term alternative for conservation. We caution that this finding warrants landscape-level field evaluation and structured adaptive management and monitoring prior to broad scale adoption as environmental policy.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Roloff, G. J., Mealey, S. P., & Bailey, J. D. (2012). Comparative hazard assessment for protected species in a fire-prone landscape. Forest Ecology and Management, 277, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.015
Academic Affiliation
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Deanne Bruner(deanne.bruner@oregonstate.edu) on 2012-07-26T18:46:12Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 BaileyJohnForestryComparativeHazardAssessment.pdf: 315517 bytes, checksum: 8270f4c4f8a60d619dfc6061368560fa (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2012-07-26T18:46:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 BaileyJohnForestryComparativeHazardAssessment.pdf: 315517 bytes, checksum: 8270f4c4f8a60d619dfc6061368560fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-08-01
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Deanne Bruner (deanne.bruner@oregonstate.edu) on 2012-07-26T18:45:37Z No. of bitstreams: 1 BaileyJohnForestryComparativeHazardAssessment.pdf: 315517 bytes, checksum: 8270f4c4f8a60d619dfc6061368560fa (MD5)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 07/07/2017

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items