A direct comparison of a depth-dependent Radiation stress formulation and a Vortex force formulation within a three-dimensional coastal ocean model Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/defaults/qz20sv018

This is an author's peer-reviewed manuscript, as accepted by the publisher. The published article is copyrighted by Elsevier and can be found at:  http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ocean-modelling/.

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • In this study a model system consisting of the three-dimensional General Estuarine Transport Model (GETM) and the third generation wind wave model SWAN was developed. Both models were coupled in two-way mode. The effects of waves were included into the ocean model by implementing the depth-dependent Radiation stress formulation (RS) of Mellor (2011a) and the Vortex force formulation (VF) presented by Bennis et al. (2011). Thus, the developed model system offers a direct comparison of these two formulations. The enhancement of the vertical eddy viscosity due to the energy transfer by white capping and breaking waves was taken into account by means of injecting turbulent kinetic energy at the surface. Wave-current interaction inside the bottom boundary layer was considered as well. The implementation of both wave-averaged formulations was validated against three flume experiments. One of these experiments with long period surface waves (swell), had not been evaluated before. The validation showed the capability of the model system to reproduce the three-dimensional interaction of waves and currents. For the flume test cases the wave-induced water level changes (wave set-up and set-down) and the corresponding depth-integrated wave-averaged velocities were similar for RS and VF. Both formulations produced comparable velocity profiles for short period waves. However, for large period waves, VF overestimated the wave set-down near the main breaking points and RS showed artificial offshore-directed transport at the surface where wave shoaling was taking place. Finally the validated model system was applied to a realistic barred beach scenario. For RS and VF the resulting velocity profiles were similar after being significantly improved by a roller evolution method. Both wave-averaged formulations generally provided similar results, but some shortcomings were revealed. Although VF partly showed significant deviations from the measurements, its results were still physically reasonable. In contrast, RS showed unrealistic offshore-directed transport in the wave-shoaling regions and close to steep bathymetry.
Resource Type
DOI
Date Available
Date Issued
Citation
  • Moghimi, S., Klingbeil, K., Graewe, U., & Burchard, H. (2013). A direct comparison of a depth-dependent radiation stress formulation and a vortex force formulation within a three-dimensional coastal ocean model. Ocean Modelling, 70, 132-144. doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.10.002
Series
Keyword
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Deanne Bruner (deanne.bruner@oregonstate.edu) on 2013-09-27T22:56:50Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MoghimiSaeedCEOASDirectComparisonDepth.pdf: 3237805 bytes, checksum: 4abfdb6d97a1f901a249953184df3334 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2013-09-27T22:56:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MoghimiSaeedCEOASDirectComparisonDepth.pdf: 3237805 bytes, checksum: 4abfdb6d97a1f901a249953184df3334 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-10

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 07/25/2017

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items