Comparing field measurement strategies for operational planning and layout Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_projects/1g05fh728

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Over the past 15 years, changes in forest-management values have led to an increase in the amount of planning requirements necessary to complete harvesting activities. The measurement of forested land areas is typically a large part of operational plans. In the two studies presented here, new measurement technologies were examined for their effectiveness in meeting those requirements. Both investigations involved area measurements and corridor layout in the Oregon Coastal mountain range. The first study compared four survey techniques for traversing 16 1-ac patches: 1) string box, hand-held compass, and clinometer; 2) laser, digital compass, and digital data collector; 3) global positioning system (GPS); and 4) the benchmark method, as set with a total station. Defining the effectiveness of each system was based on predetermined management objectives, including the precision and accuracy of data, time to complete the survey, and cost. Precision was highest with the total station, while the laser and digital compass method required the most time. The least expensive technique was the string-box method. GPS proved ineffective under dense canopy conditions. Potential differences in the orientation of harvest units were revealed because of variations in the horizontal angles used for measurements. In the second study, two surveying techniques were compared against a benchmark (i.e., total station) for profiling skyline corridors for commercial thinning. The first method employed a string box, clinometer, and hand-held compass; the second, a laser, digital compass, and digital data collector. Analysis of the profile information (slope distance and slope percent) by LoggerPC4 showed no significant differences (p<0.57) in lbs-per-payload results between the two surveying methods, based on t-tests. The string-box technique was most effective in terms of time (10.8 hr vs. 13.5 hr from the laser/digital method) and cost (S0.35/mbf vs. S1.00/mbfj. These contrasts might be attributed to differences in: 1) the position of the critical point due to elevational changes within the mid third of the profile; 2) the elevation of the intermediate support; and 3) elevation of the tail hold. The results of both studies demonstrate that many tools are available for completing operational planning and layout. Each has benefits and drawbacks that should be matched to the operational plan objectives.
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Copyright
Date Issued
Advisor
Rights Statement
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Deborah Campbell (deborah.campbell@oregonstate.edu) on 2009-05-04T21:38:39Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Solmie, Derek MF.pdf: 824081 bytes, checksum: 4ec359978cb3fca20706abee677aa1cf (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Linda Kathman(linda.kathman@oregonstate.edu) on 2009-05-04T21:55:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Solmie, Derek MF.pdf: 824081 bytes, checksum: 4ec359978cb3fca20706abee677aa1cf (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2009-05-04T21:55:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Solmie, Derek MF.pdf: 824081 bytes, checksum: 4ec359978cb3fca20706abee677aa1cf (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items