The Effects of Differing Hazelnut Concentrations in Hog Finishing Rations with Respect to Pork Shelf-life and Fatty Acid Composition Public Deposited

Analytics
http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/2227mr92r

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Commercial hog diets in the United States commonly contain lipid sources high in polyunsaturated fatty acids, most notably linoleic acid (18:2). This may result in greater deposits of linoleic acid in pork adipose tissue, contributing to an increased potential for lipid oxidation, high n-6/n-3 fatty acid ratio and increased fat softness. These factors lead to detrimental effects on shelf-life, potential negative nutritional impacts on humans and yield loss, respectively. The hazelnut is a crop abundant in nutritionally beneficial oleic acid (18:1) and the antioxidant α-tocopherol. Due to aesthetic or conformational characteristics, a cull portion of this crop is thought to be undesirable for human consumption, and offers a relatively low-cost potential feedstuff for livestock. Altering the fatty acid profile of pork to reduce proportions of linoleic acid and increase oleic acid presents the potential to improve shelf-life and impart a favorable nutritional profile in pork tissues. With this in mind, the objective of our study was to explore the effects of differing concentrations of cull hazelnuts as a lipid source in hog finishing rations, and their influence on pork shelf-life and fatty acid composition. Cull hazelnuts (95% kernel, 5% shell) were obtained and ground for replacement use in a commercially-sourced hog finishing ration. Berkshire-cross hogs (n=15, avg 97 Kg) were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (5/treatment): basal diet fed commercial pelleted finishing ration with 0% hazelnut composition (H0), 15% by overall weight hazelnut composition (H15), and 30% by overall weight hazelnut composition (H30), respectively. Hogs were fed ad libitum for 42d and then slaughtered. The Longissimus from one side of each hog was extracted 72 hr postmortem, vacuum-packaged, held at 3 ºC for 4 d to simulate transportation, and then sliced into 2.54 cm thick chops. Chops were packaged in polystyrene trays and overwrapped with O₂ permeable film, placed into a simulated retail display with continuous fluorescent lighting (3500K CCT, 1600-2200 lux) and held at 3 °C. Instrumental color was evaluated daily with a portable spectrophotometer. Samples were removed from display at days 0, 2, 4 and 6 for determination of lipid oxidation by thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). Additional samples were excised to measure fatty acid composition, α-tocopherol content and total phenols. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design, and each hog served as the experimental unit. Diet treatment was denoted as the main effect, with analysis day serving as a repeated effect in the case of shelf-life analyses. Redness (CIE a*) values in chops declined during retail display for all treatments, however rate of decline based on treatment did not differ. Lipid oxidation (TBARS) was suppressed (P<0.05) at d 6 in both H15 and H30 chops compared to H0. Total phenols were not different (P>0.05) between diet treatments, however α-tocopherol levels were 82 and 130% higher (P<0.05) in H15 and H30, respectively, than H0. Palmitic acid (16:0) levels diminished (P<0.05) in H30 pork, while oleic acid (18:1) increased (P<0.05) from 43.7% in H0 to 48.2% in H15, and 50.4% in H30 in subcutaneous fat. No significant changes (P>0.05) in linoleic acid (18:2) or n-6/n-3 ratio were identified. Through the inclusion of hazelnut feed supplementation, the fatty acid composition of pork improved nutritionally via increases in oleic acid (18:1) and decreases in palmitic acid (16:0); however, no other definite benefits were identified in this study. The suppression of TBARS can likely be attributed to an increase in α-tocopherol content in muscle, yet suppression was not significant enough to produce discernable effects on shelf-life when evaluated for instrumental color and purge loss.
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Copyright
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Field
Degree Grantor
Commencement Year
Advisor
Committee Member
Academic Affiliation
Non-Academic Affiliation
Keyword
Subject
Rights Statement
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Julie Kurtz(julie.kurtz@oregonstate.edu) on 2016-12-14T19:32:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5) ParkerNathanB2016.pdf: 1219419 bytes, checksum: f81beddaadef2ce210d71cd6b69c544b (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Laura Wilson(laura.wilson@oregonstate.edu) on 2016-12-23T18:59:56Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5) ParkerNathanB2016.pdf: 1219419 bytes, checksum: f81beddaadef2ce210d71cd6b69c544b (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2016-12-23T18:59:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5) ParkerNathanB2016.pdf: 1219419 bytes, checksum: f81beddaadef2ce210d71cd6b69c544b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-11-21
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Nathan Parker (parkerna@oregonstate.edu) on 2016-12-10T01:59:06Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5) ParkerNathanB2016.pdf: 1219419 bytes, checksum: f81beddaadef2ce210d71cd6b69c544b (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items

Thumbnail Title Date Uploaded Visibility Actions
Cn69m643p?file=thumbnail ParkerNathanB2016.pdf 2017-08-04 Public