An electrophysiological study of attention capture : Does rarity enable capture? Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/3f462988k

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Several behavioral studies have suggested that rarity is critical for enabling irrelevant, salient objects to capture attention. We tested this hypothesis using the event-related potential (ERP) component, N2pc, thought to reflect attentional allocation. A cue display was followed by a target display in which participants identified the letter in a specific color. Experiment 1 pitted rare, irrelevant abrupt onset cues (appearing on only 20% of trials) against target-relevant color cues. The relevant color cue produced large N2pc and cue validity effects, even when competing with a rare, salient, simultaneous abrupt onset. Similar results occurred even when abrupt onset frequency was reduced to only 10% of trials (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 examined rare, irrelevant color singleton cues (20% of trials). Despite being rare and salient, these singleton cues produced no N2pc or cue validity effect, indicating little attentional capture. Experiments 4a and 4b greatly increased color cue salience by adding 4 background boxes, increasing color contrast, and tripling the cue display duration (from 50 to 150 ms). Small cue validity and N2pc effects were obtained, but did not strongly depend on degree of rarity (20% vs. 100%). We argue that rarity by itself is neither necessary nor sufficient to produce attention capture.
License
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Field
Degree Grantor
Commencement Year
Advisor
Committee Member
Non-Academic Affiliation
Keyword
Subject
Rights Statement
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2015-05-21T21:09:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2NoesenBirkenT2015.pdf: 1022265 bytes, checksum: e407097f635af05447640b9a7c9aa088 (MD5)license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-05-13
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Laura Wilson(laura.wilson@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-05-21T21:09:25Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2NoesenBirkenT2015.pdf: 1022265 bytes, checksum: e407097f635af05447640b9a7c9aa088 (MD5)license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Julie Kurtz(julie.kurtz@oregonstate.edu) on 2015-05-21T20:43:20Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2NoesenBirkenT2015.pdf: 1022265 bytes, checksum: e407097f635af05447640b9a7c9aa088 (MD5)license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Birken Noesen (noesenb@onid.orst.edu) on 2015-05-21T18:30:19ZNo. of bitstreams: 2NoesenBirkenT2015.pdf: 1022265 bytes, checksum: e407097f635af05447640b9a7c9aa088 (MD5)license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Birken Noesen (noesenb@onid.orst.edu) on 2015-05-20T20:28:40ZNo. of bitstreams: 2license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5)NoesenBirkenT2015.pdf: 754270 bytes, checksum: 536e24d81b39a13bc7c488afa3b19d52 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Rejected by Julie Kurtz(julie.kurtz@oregonstate.edu), reason: Rejecting to make a change on the approval page. The first signature line should end with - representing Psychology and remove the word "Cognitive" since we do not have a major/minor called Cognitive Psychology. Everything else looks good. Once revised, log back into ScholarsArchive and go to the upload page. Replace the attached file with the revised PDF and resubmit.Thanks, Julie on 2015-05-21T17:39:45Z (GMT)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 03/23/2018

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items