Graduate Thesis Or Dissertation
 

A nonexperimental test of the contingent valuation method : comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior

Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/8049g7454

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • This study compares the results of a contingent valuation (CV) mail survey and the voting outcome of a bond measure to fund improvements, through property tax increases, to a downtown park and adjacent riverbank in Corvallis, Oregon. In addition to asking survey respondents about their voting decision, respondents are presented with a dichotomous choice CV (DC-CV) question regarding the same project. The DC-CV question mimics a typical CV question, as it involves a random pricing structure and a hypothetical policy. However, the subject of the DC-CV question is the same as a known referendum. Responses to both valuation questions are nonbinding. In this study, survey referendum responses closely match the actual voting outcome and willingness to pay (WTP) estimates based on survey referendum responses and precinct-level voting results are not statistically different. WTP based on DC-CV responses match WTP based on actual voting behavior only when the survey sample is restricted to respondents that face a random bid price that is close to the proposed tax increase. Otherwise, the WTP based on DC-CV responses is lower than WTP based on voting behavior. A comparison of responses between the two valuation questions suggests that respondents made rational choices with regards to relative prices in the hypothetical scenario. Tangential CV issues, such as the treatment of "undecided" responses and detection of yea-saying in dichotomous choice responses are also explored.
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Field
Degree Grantor
Commencement Year
Advisor
Committee Member
Academic Affiliation
Non-Academic Affiliation
Subject
Rights Statement
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Digitization Specifications
  • File scanned at 300 ppi (Monochrome) using Capture Perfect 3.0.82 on a Canon DR-9080C in PDF format. CVista PdfCompressor 4.0 was used for pdf compression and textual OCR.
Replaces
Accessibility Feature

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

In Collection:

Items