The Sum of its Parts : Investigating the Component Pieces of GenderMag Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/9p290g044

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Previous work introduced the GenderMag method, a software inspection method used to help software creators identify features within their software that are not gender-inclusive. Inclusiveness of software (gender or otherwise) matters because supporting diversity matters—it is well-known that the more diverse a group of problem-solvers, the higher the quality of the solution. In this thesis, we investigate the two component parts of GenderMag: the customized cognitive walkthrough and the gendered personas. To investigate the cognitive walkthrough component, we analyze data collected from a field study that explores the experience of teams of software professionals using GenderMag. We pinpoint situations that we term “detours” during which teams were 6 times more likely to make errors on the cognitive walkthrough forms than they did outside of detours. To investigate the personas component, we present a lab study that investigates the tension between gendered personas and inappropriate stereotyping. We explore a new approach to personas: one that includes multiple photos (of males and females) for a single persona. Our results are encouraging about the use of personas with multiple pictures to expand participants’ consideration of multiple genders without reducing their engagement with the persona. Between the two studies, we find answers to the question: How does each component part of GenderMag contribute to (or detract from) its overall goal of helping to identify gender biases in software?
License
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Field
Degree Grantor
Commencement Year
Advisor
Committee Member
Academic Affiliation
Non-Academic Affiliation
Keyword
Rights Statement
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Margaret Mellinger(margaret.mellinger@oregonstate.edu) on 2017-10-16T23:38:16Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1Hillc_Thesis_Final_Scholars_Archive.pdf: 3331445 bytes, checksum: 13afc5d66ccad26833a5d13b33b5eaab (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Charles Hill (hillc@oregonstate.edu) on 2017-09-11T20:27:22ZNo. of bitstreams: 1Hillc_Thesis_Final_Scholars_Archive.docx: 7394316 bytes, checksum: 27da89ce32ae12ec86b150e5ce425783 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Rejected by Julie Kurtz(julie.kurtz@oregonstate.edu), reason: Hi Charles,Rejecting because it was uploaded with a word doc and it needs to be a PDF. Once revised, log back into ScholarsArchive and go to the upload page. Replace the attached file with the revised PDF and resubmit.Thanks,Julie. on 2017-09-22T18:06:24Z (GMT)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Charles Hill (hillc@oregonstate.edu) on 2017-09-22T19:33:32ZNo. of bitstreams: 1Hillc_Thesis_Final_Scholars_Archive.pdf: 3331445 bytes, checksum: 13afc5d66ccad26833a5d13b33b5eaab (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-16T23:38:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1Hillc_Thesis_Final_Scholars_Archive.pdf: 3331445 bytes, checksum: 13afc5d66ccad26833a5d13b33b5eaab (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Julie Kurtz(julie.kurtz@oregonstate.edu) on 2017-09-22T20:07:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1Hillc_Thesis_Final_Scholars_Archive.pdf: 3331445 bytes, checksum: 13afc5d66ccad26833a5d13b33b5eaab (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items