|Abstract or Summary
- Pacific Northwest prairies have become significantly reduced in extent, and in the Willamette Valley of Oregon, less than one percent of native upland prairies remain. Many species have been impacted by this extreme loss of habitat, including Castilleja levisecta (golden paintbrush), a threatened hemiparasitic forb species endemic to the Pacific Northwest. Many of the prairie fragments that remain are poor quality, and face the threat of invasion from non-native species and a loss of biodiversity. These non-native species pose an obstacle to restoration and to the reintroduction of threatened and endangered species. Nutrient enrichment has been shown to promote increased invasion of communities, decrease success of native species, and decrease biodiversity. A way to counter these effects is through carbon addition to the soil which stimulates microbial activity and immobilizes nutrients, making them unavailable to plants. This strategy has potential as a restoration tool to improve conditions for native species, which are often outcompeted under high nutrient conditions.
We tested the efficacy of carbon addition for controlling non-native species and restoring C. levisecta in two Willamette Valley prairies. We created treatments of varying nutrient availability and measured the responses of the plant community and of C. levisecta. Experimental plots were established in autumn 2012 with either carbon (sucrose) addition, ambient soil nutrients (controls), or nutrient addition (NPK fertilizer). Nutrient treatments were reapplied throughout the length of the experiment. Crossed with these treatments in a fully factorial design were seeding treatments of C. levisecta and of thirteen other native species, to increase the diversity of the plant community, providing host plants for C. levisecta, a hemiparasitic plant. In the two growing seasons following treatment we conducted plant community surveys and counted and measured seedlings of C. levisecta to determine the effects of the nutrient manipulations and seeding treatments on the community overall and on this threatened plant.
Community composition differed significantly between the different nutrient treatments (perMANOVA, p<0.001) at both study sites, and in both years of the experiment. Mean total vascular plant cover was significantly reduced by carbon addition compared to ambient nutrient availability, and increased by nutrient addition. Native grasses were unaffected by nutrient manipulation at either site, whereas non-native grasses were greatly reduced by carbon addition and increased by nutrient addition, compared to ambient soil nutrient availability. Non-native forbs were also greatly reduced by carbon addition, and were also reduced by nutrient addition by the second year of the experiment. Richness of non-native species was more affected by nutrient manipulation than richness of natives, and was either increased or unaffected by nutrient enrichment and decreased by carbon addition. Some non-native species were found to be highly affected by the nutrient manipulation, while others were not, suggesting that carbon addition may be an effective control for only certain non-native species.
At both sites, C. levisecta emergence was lower in carbon addition plots compared with controls. In nutrient addition plots, C. levisecta emergence was higher at one site but lower at the other compared with controls, suggesting that nutrient addition may be beneficial only under certain conditions. Additionally, by the second year of the experiment, there was no difference in C. levisecta numbers between the control and nutrient addition plots at one site, and there were fewer in the nutrient addition plots than in controls at the other site. The seeding of additional native species increased community richness but had little effect on diversity and no effect on C. levisecta establishment.
Overall, these results suggest that nutrient enrichment can promote the success of non-native species and that carbon addition can be used to counter these effects on a species- and site-specific basis. However, carbon addition did not improve reintroduction success of a threatened plant species, C. levisecta, and the effects of nutrient addition on its success after two years were mixed.