Individual Differences in Intuitive Risk Judgments Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/jh343z15c

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • The present research sought to investigate individual differences in the way individuals process intuitive risk judgments. The present investigation is centered on Fuzzy Trace Theory (Brainerd & Reyna
  • The present research sought to investigate individual differences in the way individuals process intuitive risk judgments. The present investigation is centered on Fuzzy Trace Theory (Brainerd & Reyna, 1991), a developmental dual process theory of cognition which posits two ways in which individuals process information, gist and verbatim processing. 228 participants completed a battery of self-report personality measures as well as an intuitive risk judgment task that required participants to judge a particular situation as either a “good” or “bad” idea to engage in. Response times to the risk judgments were recorded and used in conjunction with actual responses and used to operationalize gist and verbatim processing. This operationalization was then correlated with other theoretically relevant measures of personality in order to demonstrate convergent validity. Results indicated differential support for the convergent validity of our gist and verbatim operationalization. Response times were related to risk-taking propensity, and personality traits such as honesty humility, and impulsivity. These findings provide some clarity to theoretical presumptions made by Fuzzy Trace Theory while providing a potentially useful operationalization of gist and verbatim processing.
License
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Copyright
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Grantor
Commencement Year
Advisor
Committee Member
Non-Academic Affiliation
Keyword
Rights Statement
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Julie Kurtz(julie.kurtz@oregonstate.edu) on 2017-06-21T17:09:23Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5) BrunotAlexanderN2017.pdf: 633401 bytes, checksum: abd3a276a47abd5224d9a0f830db2035 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-26T23:05:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5) BrunotAlexanderN2017.pdf: 633401 bytes, checksum: abd3a276a47abd5224d9a0f830db2035 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-06-02
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Steven Van Tuyl(steve.vantuyl@oregonstate.edu) on 2017-06-26T23:05:38Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5) BrunotAlexanderN2017.pdf: 633401 bytes, checksum: abd3a276a47abd5224d9a0f830db2035 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Alexander Brunot (brunota@onid.orst.edu) on 2017-06-07T15:38:22Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1223 bytes, checksum: d127a3413712d6c6e962d5d436c463fc (MD5) BrunotAlexanderN2017.pdf: 633401 bytes, checksum: abd3a276a47abd5224d9a0f830db2035 (MD5)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 11/08/2017

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items