Multi-trait selection in coastal Douglas-fir Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/pz50gz15z

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Index selection provides an efficient means of conducting selection on multiple traits by combining information on economic value, heritability, and the genetic and phenotypic correlations between traits to improve overall merit. The use of this method in forestry has been hampered by the lack of knowledge of the relative importance of individual traits in determining tree value. Data recently made available from a lumber recovery study made it possible to a) estimate relative economic weights for individual tree traits that are important in determining lumber value of coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) France var. menziesii) under two grading systems (visual and machine-stress-rated (MSR)) and b) test the implications of alternative weights under various multi-trait selection indices. Economic weights were derived by stepwise regression of total tree value, based on either visual or MSR grading of recovered lumber, on a variety of traits measured on 164 young-growth (ages 36-66 years) Douglas-fir trees in western Washington and Oregon. Two traits were found to have a significant influence on tree value under visual grading, stem volume and branch diameter, with relative economic weights 0.06 dm3 and -5.22 cm, respectively. In addition to volume and branch diameter, wood density also significantly influenced tree value under MSR grading (relative economic weights 0.06 dm3, -6.69 cm, and 0.06 kg/rn3, respectively), where lumber strength is measured directly. Selection indices and expected responses of volume, branch diameter, and wood density to index selection were examined utilizing progeny test data from 20-year old trees of 85 open-pollinated families replicated on three planting sites. The derived selection indices were quite different for the two lumber grading schemes, as were the expected responses in individual traits. Under visual grading, expected response in volume is large, but because wood density was not included in the index, a large negative (unfavorable) response in wood density is also expected. Using MSR grading, a positive response is expected in both volume and wood density, but the expected response in volume is less than when visual grading is used to determine economic weights. Little response in branch diameter is expected even though branch diameter was included as a trait in both indices. This is due to the low variability of branch diameter and its adverse genetic correlation with volume. Changes in genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates (tested by using only a portion of the progeny test data) resulted in different index coefficients and changes in expected responses of individual traits. These results emphasize the necessity of evaluating the implications of using a particular index prior to applying it to a breeding population. In one case, a desired gain index, with desired relative responses for volume and wood density equaling the MSR-based economic weights, was successful in predicting positive responses in both volume and wood density where a Smith-Hazel index had resulted in a negative response in volume. Thus, this type of restricted selection index provides a means of increasing overall merit while dictating the allowable changes in each trait.
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Field
Degree Grantor
Commencement Year
Advisor
Committee Member
Academic Affiliation
Non-Academic Affiliation
Subject
Rights Statement
Language
Digitization Specifications
  • PDF derivative scanned at 300 ppi (256 B&W), using Capture Perfect 3.0, on a Canon DR-9080C. CVista PdfCompressor 4.0 was used for pdf compression and textual OCR.
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Linda Kathman(linda.kathman@oregonstate.edu) on 2008-11-25T22:15:17Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Aubry_Carol_A_1992.pdf: 441921 bytes, checksum: 29e45e5ff3a517baa3c95f05f3229a00 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Linda Kathman(linda.kathman@oregonstate.edu) on 2008-11-25T22:12:24Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Aubry_Carol_A_1992.pdf: 441921 bytes, checksum: 29e45e5ff3a517baa3c95f05f3229a00 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Anna Opoien (aoscanner@gmail.com) on 2008-11-19T21:30:09Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Aubry_Carol_A_1992.pdf: 441921 bytes, checksum: 29e45e5ff3a517baa3c95f05f3229a00 (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2008-11-25T22:15:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Aubry_Carol_A_1992.pdf: 441921 bytes, checksum: 29e45e5ff3a517baa3c95f05f3229a00 (MD5)

Relationships

In Administrative Set:
Last modified: 08/02/2017

Downloadable Content

Download PDF
Citations:

EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley

Items