Influence of wetland landscape structure of shorebirds wintering in an agricultural valley Public Deposited

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/qv33rz87m

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Understanding how wetland birds use habitat is pivotal to developing successful and beneficial conservation strategies. Although it has been an ardent topic in forest research for some time, how species interact with the spatial patterning of habitat across a landscape (i.e., landscape structure) has been more or less neglected in wetland research. There is every reason to believe that landscape structure might influence wetland birds, especially since most species are highly mobile and so many wetland landscapes are inherently heterogeneous. Moreover, as a result of the agricultural development of riverine valleys, many former wetland landscapes have undergone profound changes in landscape structure. To ultimately determine how such landscapes should be restored, researchers need to integrate information generated from three basic questions: what was the historical nature of the landscape?, what is the present-day distribution of habitat and resources?, and most importantly, how do wetland species currently interact with local (within wetlands) and landscape (within a region) habitat distribution? This dissertation examines these questions for the Willamette Valley ("Valley") of northwestern Oregon, USA. The Valley is an excellent model landscape for such a study as wetland loss from agriculture and urban development has been severe, waterbirds use the many unprotected agricultural wetlands distributed across the region, and many agencies and coalitions are interested in restoring the Valley using an integrated landscape approach. To understand how conservation efforts should proceed at both a local and landscape scale, I assessed the: 1) historical (circa 1840) nature and waterbird use of Valley wetlands, 2) typical distribution of wetland habitat and invertebrate resources today, and 3) current influences of wetland landscape structure and local conditions on winter wetland habitat use by a highly mobile but relatively understudied group of waterbirds - shorebirds (Charadriformes). I began by compiling a profile of the historic Valley from historical land cover data and primary accounts (e.g., from naturalists, settlers, fur trappers). The distribution of 'shorebird habitat' (wet, <50% vegetation cover) during two winters of vastly differing rainfall (1999-2000: wet winter, 2000-2001: dry winter) was then mapped using a combination of remotely sensed imagery and data acquired in the field. I estimated invertebrate resources of Valley wetlands by sampling the benthos of sites potentially attractive to shorebirds. Finally, I monitored wetland use (frequency of occurrence, abundances) by two focal shorebird species (Dunlin Calidris alpina, Killdeer Charadrius vociferus) over the same two winters (wet and dry) and examined how use of regions and individual wetland sites were related to wetland landscape structure (amount of shorebird habitat within regions) and landscape context (amount of shorebird habitat surrounding sites), respectively. I also used locally measured features (availability of shorebird habitat and invertebrate abundance within wetlands) to assess evidence for hierarchical habitat use (influence of shorebird habitat within and surrounding sites) and to determine if landscape context mediated the influence of local food abundance on bird use. I analyzed data using multiple linear regression and information theoretic (AIC) approaches to model selection. Historical research revealed that Valley wetlands were of three valuable types to nonbreeding waterbirds (i.e., emergent wetlands, riverine wetlands, and wetland prairie) and the numbers and diversity of waterbirds using these wetlands was generally much greater than they are today. The most extensive wetland habitat type was wetland prairie, which functioned as valuable fall/winter habitat for waterbirds, but only while native Kalapuyans managed the region with fire. Current land cover data from the winters of 1999-2001 indicate that while prime shorebird habitat (wet, unvegetated) on agricultural land can be abundant and widely distributed in wet years, it is typically scarce and more aggregated during dry winters. Compared to resource levels in winter at other important wintering regions in North America, invertebrates of Valley wetlands were of moderate abundance for most sites sampled. Finally, model selection results indicated that landscape structure was an important positive determinant of Dunlin abundances within regions and within wetlands, but only during the dry winter. Dunlin abundances at sites were also positively associated with local conditions (amount of available wet habitat, percent of soil exposed, invertebrate food abundance) during the dry winter. Kilideer use of sites was unrelated to landscape structure and local conditions during both winters. Overall, results from this dissertation indicate that wetland landscapes like the Valley hold great potential for restoration and that landscape planners should consider the spatially-explicit nature of wetland sites (where they are located in relation to others) when prioritizing sites to conserve. Within individual wetlands prioritized for conservation, managers should then promote certain local conditions (shallowly flooded and exposed substrates, productive invertebrate communities) that benefit foraging shorebirds and other waterbirds. Contributing to the field of landscape ecology, this study is among the first to examine the relationship between landscape pattern and ecological processes in wetland systems, specifically for wetland birds in winter. It illustrates the potential influence of landscape structure in any wetland region, and thus the importance of considering the spatial distribution of habitat for the successful conservation of wetlands and waterbirds.
License
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Field
Degree Grantor
Commencement Year
Advisor
Committee Member
Academic Affiliation
Non-Academic Affiliation
Subject
Rights Statement
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Digitization Specifications
  • File scanned at 300 ppi (Monochrome, 256 Grayscale, 24-bit Color) using Capture Perfect 3.0.82 on a Canon DR-9080C in PDF format. CVista PdfCompressor 4.0 was used for pdf compression and textual OCR.
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2011-02-09T21:13:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1TaftOrianeWilliams2005.pdf: 4489772 bytes, checksum: 8f6db32a99a9194429c094aa6470027b (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Patricia Black(patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2011-02-08T20:32:29Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1TaftOrianeWilliams2005.pdf: 4489772 bytes, checksum: 8f6db32a99a9194429c094aa6470027b (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Patricia Black(patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2011-02-09T21:13:04Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1TaftOrianeWilliams2005.pdf: 4489772 bytes, checksum: 8f6db32a99a9194429c094aa6470027b (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Erin Clark (ecscannerosu@gmail.com) on 2011-02-08T20:22:57ZNo. of bitstreams: 1TaftOrianeWilliams2005.pdf: 4489772 bytes, checksum: 8f6db32a99a9194429c094aa6470027b (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items