Honors College Thesis


Practicality Over Partisanship: The Prospect of Universal Healthcare in the United States Public Deposited

Downloadable Content

Download PDF


Attribute NameValues
  • My study of universal healthcare was motivated by the juxtaposition of social welfare and self-interest in the United States. Unlike most other industrialized countries—whom have adopted either a multi-payer or single-payer system of universal healthcare—the United States is situated uniquely, from both a philosophical and political standpoint. Among others, it was Adam Smith who emphasized the importance of rational self-interest in a capitalist economy. It is fascinating to consider universal healthcare in the United States because of our fixation with self-interest at the expense of the common good, and in which cases it is appropriate. Consequently, the United States has created a social safety net to accommodate for certain human rights, but not all. This thesis examines the intersection of the American politics and universal healthcare. Adam Smith’s ideology played a crucial role in shaping our system of governance, and it was my goal to better explain why providing an adequate standard of medical care, as a right, to every American is not the current practice, and why it is impractical this is the case. After review of existing literature, I also concluded a multi-payer universal healthcare system is the most practical path forward for the United States.
Resource Type
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Field
Degree Grantor
Commencement Year
Committee Member
Non-Academic Affiliation
Rights Statement
Peer Reviewed



This work has no parents.

In Collection: