May I Interject: An Investigation into Gendered Oral Argument Patterns in Federal Appellant Courts

Undergraduate Thesis Or Project

Public Deposited

Citeable URL: https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/undergraduate_thesis_or_projects/xg94hw55x

Descriptions

Attribute Name	Values
Creator	Carsh, Austin Ellertson, Megan Fernández-Ortega, Rodrigo Larsen, Leif Solberg, Rorie L.
Abstract	Oral argument has always been an integral part of any appellate courts’ function. For most of the court’s history, both the advocates arguing before the Court and the judges presiding over the court were extremely similar; all being white males. However, the late 20th and 21st centuries have diversified both of these groups, enabling the study of communication patterns as they relate to gender and race. Thus the question of interest: Are there differences in the way that female and male advocates are treated by judges during oral argument within the federal appellate court system.
Resource Type	Poster
Date Issued	2019
Degree Level	Bachelor's
Degree Name	Bachelor of Science (B.S.)
Degree Field	Political Science
Degree Grantor	Oregon State University
Commencement Year	2020
Academic Affiliation	Public Policy
Rights Statement	In Copyright
Publisher	Oregon State University
Peer Reviewed	No
Language	English [eng]
Embargo date range	2019-12-04 to 2020-07-05

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Visibility	Actions
	May-I-Interject-final-poster.pdf	2019-10-22	Public	Download