Exploring Perceptions of Social Responsibility in Engineering Students Public

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/honors_college_theses/z890rw23x

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract or Summary
  • Incoming and graduating engineering students in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University were surveyed in order to assess awareness and integration of social responsibilities into their emerging professional persona and how those views are informed by program and faculty interactions. Preliminary analysis of responses indicate that student perceptions of social responsibility may vary with academic progress and discipline. Questions were grouped into scales and analyzed for reliability in SPSS using the Cronbach’s alpha score. A reliable scale for professional responsibility was identified in both incoming and graduating students and a reliable depoliticization scale was identified in graduating students only. Graduating students in bioengineering rejected elements of meritocracy, attributed in part to completing discipline-specific coursework focused on deconstructing power, privilege and oppression in society and within engineering. Graduating students in all disciplines were less likely to identify a professional responsibility as an engineer to design accessible and inexpensive products, perhaps a result of the for-profit corporate job market most engineers will enter. Further quantitative analysis of the data set is recommended to identify correlations between demographic variables and social responsibility perceptions. This should be complimented by recording qualitative focus group data which could provide further insight into how students understand social responsibility. Key Words: Engineering, Social Responsibility, Meritocracy, Depoliticization
License
Resource Type
Date Available
Date Issued
Degree Level
Degree Name
Degree Field
Degree Grantor
Commencement Year
Advisor
Non-Academic Affiliation
Rights Statement
Funding Statement (additional comments about funding)
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces
Additional Information
  • description.provenance : Submitted by Amy Jahr (jahra@oregonstate.edu) on 2016-03-09T01:34:05ZNo. of bitstreams: 1JahrAmyE2016.pdf: 595166 bytes, checksum: e636245b19b4967149ba76696200eb4c (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-09T17:48:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1JahrAmyE2016.pdf: 595166 bytes, checksum: e636245b19b4967149ba76696200eb4c (MD5)
  • description.provenance : Approved for entry into archive by Patricia Black(patricia.black@oregonstate.edu) on 2016-03-09T17:48:56Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1JahrAmyE2016.pdf: 595166 bytes, checksum: e636245b19b4967149ba76696200eb4c (MD5)

Relationships

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Last modified

Downloadable Content

Download PDF

Items