Index Catalog // ScholarsArchive@OSU

Creator:: Kimmel, Charles B., Watson, Sawyer, Couture, Ryan B., McKibben, Natasha S., Nichols, James T., Richardson, Shannon E., and Noakes, David L. G.
Abstract:: What is the nature of evolutionary divergence of the jaw skeleton within the genus Oncorhynchus? How can two associated bones evolve new shapes and still maintain functional integration? Here, we introduce and test a ‘concordance’ hypothesis, in which an extraordinary matching of the evolutionary shape changes of the dentary and...

Creator:: Kimmel, Charles B., Watson, Sawyer, Couture, Ryan B., McKibben, Natasha S., Nichols, James T., Richardson, Shannon E., and Noakes, David L. G.
Abstract:: What is the nature of evolutionary divergence of the jaw skeleton within the genus Oncorhynchus? How can two associated bones evolve new shapes and still maintain functional integration? Here, we introduce and test a ‘concordance’ hypothesis, in which an extraordinary matching of the evolutionary shape changes of the dentary and...

Creator:: Kimmel, Charles B., Watson, Sawyer, Couture, Ryan B., McKibben, Natasha S., Nichols, James T., Richardson, Shannon E., and Noakes, David L. G.
Abstract:: What is the nature of evolutionary divergence of the jaw skeleton within the genus Oncorhynchus? How can two associated bones evolve new shapes and still maintain functional integration? Here, we introduce and test a ‘concordance’ hypothesis, in which an extraordinary matching of the evolutionary shape changes of the dentary and...

Creator:: Kimmel, Charles B., Watson, Sawyer, Couture, Ryan B., McKibben, Natasha S., Nichols, James T., Richardson, Shannon E., and Noakes, David L. G.
Abstract:: What is the nature of evolutionary divergence of the jaw skeleton within the genus Oncorhynchus? How can two associated bones evolve new shapes and still maintain functional integration? Here, we introduce and test a ‘concordance’ hypothesis, in which an extraordinary matching of the evolutionary shape changes of the dentary and...

Creator:: Kimmel, Charles B., Watson, Sawyer, Couture, Ryan B., McKibben, Natasha S., Nichols, James T., Richardson, Shannon E., and Noakes, David L. G.
Abstract:: What is the nature of evolutionary divergence of the jaw skeleton within the genus Oncorhynchus? How can two associated bones evolve new shapes and still maintain functional integration? Here, we introduce and test a ‘concordance’ hypothesis, in which an extraordinary matching of the evolutionary shape changes of the dentary and...

Creator:: Kimmel, Charles B., Watson, Sawyer, Couture, Ryan B., McKibben, Natasha S., Nichols, James T., Richardson, Shannon E., and Noakes, David L. G.
Abstract:: What is the nature of evolutionary divergence of the jaw skeleton within the genus Oncorhynchus? How can two associated bones evolve new shapes and still maintain functional integration? Here, we introduce and test a ‘concordance’ hypothesis, in which an extraordinary matching of the evolutionary shape changes of the dentary and...

Creator:: Kimmel, Charles B., Watson, Sawyer, Couture, Ryan B., McKibben, Natasha S., Nichols, James T., Richardson, Shannon E., and Noakes, David L. G.
Abstract:: What is the nature of evolutionary divergence of the jaw skeleton within the genus Oncorhynchus? How can two associated bones evolve new shapes and still maintain functional integration? Here, we introduce and test a ‘concordance’ hypothesis, in which an extraordinary matching of the evolutionary shape changes of the dentary and...

Creator:: Kimmel, Charles B., Watson, Sawyer, Couture, Ryan B., McKibben, Natasha S., Nichols, James T., Richardson, Shannon E., and Noakes, David L. G.
Abstract:: What is the nature of evolutionary divergence of the jaw skeleton within the genus Oncorhynchus? How can two associated bones evolve new shapes and still maintain functional integration? Here, we introduce and test a ‘concordance’ hypothesis, in which an extraordinary matching of the evolutionary shape changes of the dentary and...

Creator:: Kimmel, Charles B., Watson, Sawyer, Couture, Ryan B., McKibben, Natasha S., Nichols, James T., Richardson, Shannon E., and Noakes, David L. G.
Abstract:: What is the nature of evolutionary divergence of the jaw skeleton within the genus Oncorhynchus? How can two associated bones evolve new shapes and still maintain functional integration? Here, we introduce and test a ‘concordance’ hypothesis, in which an extraordinary matching of the evolutionary shape changes of the dentary and...

Creator:: Kimmel, Charles B., Watson, Sawyer, Couture, Ryan B., McKibben, Natasha S., Nichols, James T., Richardson, Shannon E., and Noakes, David L. G.
Abstract:: What is the nature of evolutionary divergence of the jaw skeleton within the genus Oncorhynchus? How can two associated bones evolve new shapes and still maintain functional integration? Here, we introduce and test a ‘concordance’ hypothesis, in which an extraordinary matching of the evolutionary shape changes of the dentary and...

ScholarsArchive@OSU