Article
 

Conway's Law Revisited: The Evidence For a Task-based Perspective

Público Deposited

Contenido Descargable

Descargar PDF
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/m900nv57t

Descriptions

Attribute NameValues
Creator
Abstract
  • A long-standing approach to deal with complex product development is to divide the system into smaller parts and assign responsibility for developing those parts to particular teams. Conventional wisdom suggests that by doing so, we reduce the communication overhead in the development project by making the separate development teams as independent as possible. This approach has been labeled in academic circles as “Conway’s Law” or “the Mirroring Hypothesis”. Conway (1968) argued that “development organizations... are constrained to produce designs which are copies of the communication structures of these organizations''. Conway’s arguments were later further developed and refined by other researchers such as Parnas (1972), Herbsleb and Grinter (1999), and Baldwin and Clark (2000). Furthermore, alignment between the technical and organizational structures results in improvements in product development productivity and quality for physical systems (Baldwin & Clark, 2000; Colfer & Baldwin, 2010). However, when it comes to developing software systems, the evidence about the “mirror” in Conway’s law and its benefits to software projects outcomes is less clear.
  • This is the author's peer-reviewed final manuscript, as accepted by the publisher. The published article is copyrighted by IEEE Computer Society and can be found at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=52.
  • Keywords: software architecture, evidence-based software engineering, software design, engineering management, organizations
Resource Type
DOI
Fecha Disponible
Fecha de Emisión
Citation
  • Kwan, I.; Cataldo, M.; Damian, D.; , "Conway's Law Revisited: The Evidence for a Task-Based Perspective," Software, IEEE , vol.29, no.1, pp.90-93, Jan.-Feb. 2012 doi: 10.1109/MS.2012.3
Journal Title
Journal Volume
  • 29
Journal Issue/Number
  • 1
Declaración de derechos
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Language
Replaces

Relaciones

Parents:

This work has no parents.

Elementos